We then will be able to dob in persons sleeping in the same bed who are on welfare. So begins the rise of the police State

Dear Josephus,

Perhaps allowing marriage would take care of
any interference in people's lives?

What do you think?

//Toni Lavis "I need a licence just to go fishing."

Why?//

Because that is what the law says.

//But why does anyone need a "licence" to love and live with someone?//

They don't. But they do if they want to get married. Maybe we should abolish marriage. But if we do that then the religious right will make a fuss about being forced to live in sin.

//Have a Referendum"

Too right! What might that be, around $60 million//

It would be far cheaper to just have the Parliament amend the marriage act. But for some reason the religious right object to that idea. Maybe you should try and convince them that letting Parliament sort it out is a better idea.

Dear Toni,

Of course Parliament could settle this matter
by allowing a conscience vote.
But Mr Abbott will have none of it. He
prefers a plebiscite (not power to affect
any changes) or a Referendum - more stalling
and deterrence and of course - expense. If a
Referendum was held outside an election the
cost involved is something like $160 million.
If it was held during an election the cost is
around the $60 million dollar mark. Mr Abbott
prefers it to be outside an election. The cheapest
option is to just allow Parliament to decide.
Which according to the High Court - it has the
power to do. And it could all be over one way or
the other tomorrow - if Mr Abbott would agree.

Toni Lavis "Because that is what the law says."

Yes, let's respect the law when the law says women can't vote.
And Blacks must sit on these bus seats.
And Jews must wear a yellow star.

Oh no, but... THOSE laws were wrong, wrong, wrong and people had *every right* to object/defy/denounce/refuse/etc.

"But if we do that then the religious right will make a fuss about being forced to live in sin."

You, like most advocates, are confusing two different things: The religious/ceremonial "marriage" and the state registered "marriage".

You can "marry" your dog in a church if you can find a church that will do that (St Roch's?).
You just can't *register* your interspecies marriage with the county clerk.

Another common confusion is "weddings" and "marriage".
Advocates often proclaim gay marriage will be good for the economy.
No, *weddings* are good for the economy.

And you can have a *wedding* right now, this evening, if you feel like it.
A gay wedding, a dog wedding, an anything wedding.
Right now! No laws required.

Insight - Capture the Flag: Rebels & Rainbows
http://www.redicecreations.com/TV/2015/Insight-Rebels-Rainbows.php

Supreme Court’s Gay Marriage Agenda
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=830
by Br Nathanael (exJew)

US Supreme Court’s Gay Marriage Agenda
http://brothernathanaelchannel.com/watch_video.php?v=799BW7BH2MOX

Sodom ~ New Film Exposes the Lies of Organized LGBT 'Acceptance'
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/sodomdocumentary17oct14.shtml#top
Greg Felton; America is now fully controlled by Zionists says Canadian researcher

Hidden History of How the U S Was Used to Create Israel Alison Weir

Antidote to Zionism: Boycott Israel (June 5, 2015)