Don't worry Susie, the homaphobs will subject those poor tainted children to electric shock treatment to correct their perverse leanings. Then hand them over to Father Fcukemup from the Catholic Church to have his way with them. Then after that, all will be "normal"!

'Besides what consenting adults do in the privacy of
their homes should surely be none of our business'

strangely enough the deviants who want to promote perversion to kids at school should be told that.

Fox, " sexual practices - why not include ones that are "kinky" that heterosexuals engage in as well"

Fox, "all kinds of sexual behaviour exists among other groups of people as well, apart from the ones he was singling out." and "Besides what consenting adults do in the privacy of their homes should surely be none of our business"

First, the left is forever proposing new invasions of individual's privacy and that includes State intrusions enforced by law into property to inspect and to enforce the ever increasing array of laws conjured up to suit leftist idealism.

The Left believe in State control, the Big State, interfering in and even running the citizen's life. That is inherent to their ideology and modus operandi.

All here must be in housing commission rentals if they are so ignorant of the expanding 'right' of the State, enforced by new laws, to enter private property and presume to tell the owner what to do. Ask any farmer.

Of course to leftists whatever suits their ideology is right, that goes without question. The leftists are precious(sl.UK) and highly indignant where their rights might be affected.

Not suggesting that the State should have that involvement, but it is always worth countering leftist narrative that can be treated as fact if the lie and hypocrisy are not immediately pointed out.
tbc..

otb,

While it may be interesting to you to continue to
carry on about the "Left," in every one of your posts.
How about actually addressing the topic - with reason,
clarity, and intelligence. If you want to discuss anything
else - start your own thread. You're sounding very strange
to continually make every issue about "The Left."

What's wrong with you. Aren't you capable of any serious
discussion on any other topic.

Dear O Sung Wu,

The following website may be of some interest.
It's written from a Gay man's perspective and
of course will be rejected by many people.
However it may help towards a better understanding
to read what someone of that inclination thinks and feels.
He talks about the ten biggest lies we're told about Gay
men:

http://mic.com/articles/50621/10-biggest-lies-you-were-told-about-gay-men

I've learned that making sweeping generalisations about any
group and classing them all together does not allow for individual
differences between people. We're all different in our practices
and beliefs and values in many areas.

contd..

Secondly, regarding the 'kinky' high risk sexual behaviours and noting those too that fit under the sado-masochistic description, that some leftists here regard as 'tres progressive' and are frivolous about. Of course medical authorities should be concerned about the health costs of risky sexual practices. Yes, there may be consenting acts that require police attention and yes, formal charges may be considered.

Regarding the specious rationalisation that any act is defensible and probably OK if someone else is doing it. I have remarked numerous times in threads where practices such as anal sex are being treated frivolously and even spruiked(?!) by OLO's relentless warriors of all things 'Progressive' and gay, that authorities and public should be very concerned about the threat to the health, wellbeing and future childbearing of girls and young women who are being given the false idea that such practices are 'normal' and usual.

It is NOT acceptable that young women are being made to feel that they are letting their male partners down by standing their digs and refusing 'kinky', risky sex.

Doubtless they and young males are being badly informed by the proliferation and normalisation of high risk sex, anal sex in particular, in films and the media generally, even talk shows (eh, ABC?).

Honestly, how many young women would be 'bum girls' if the choice was completely up to them? Of course they should be advised of the extreme risks and that the sole 'protection'(sic) a condom is a risk in itself. Taking into account the likely very serious consequences, the only possible rational response to such demands is a flat 'NO!'.

To end, it should be a legal requirement for any man who has engaged in anal sex with another man to always divulge that to woman as a part of obtaining consent. While that does not deal entirely with the risks, it would go some way towards recognising the woman's right to basic information on which to base her decision. The incidence of cross-over of HIV to heterosexual women of childbearing age is a serious concern.