Fox,

For heterosexuals, it is the proved failure rate of condoms and even condoms plus the contraceptive pill that is used to justify abortion.

'Perfect' (ie impossible) use of condoms for vaginal sex: 98%

Typical use failure rate of condoms for VAGINAL sex: 18%

- For each method of birth control, effectiveness with typical use is provided as the percent of women who experience an unintended pregnancy within the first year of typical use (also known as the failure rate).

The condom failure rate where anal sex is concerned is far higher because condoms are much more likely to be damaged and dislodged. Add to that the likelihood of damage because the back passage is not designed for thrusting with a firm object. Again, a man who demands anal sex is a risk taker who is likely indulging in other risky behaviour.

Which means that women who are giving in to anal sex (or are having vaginal or other sex with someone who has had anal sex) are dicing with serious harm to themselves and compromising their future childbearing.

The likelihood of a condom failure is undeniably high even from a single encounter. For women, the negative consequences of anal sex can be very harsh indeed.

It bears repeating that gay activists try to camouflage the risks factors and normalise the practice of anal sex and other risky behaviour with dishonest tricks of argument

rehctub,

"I ask again, seeing as you are an obvious supporter of queers rights, where is the problem with that?

I don't believe I've stated my position regarding that on this thread - I'm more interested in watching the likes of you parade your bourgeois "normality" around here.

Fascinating....

And then you say things like this:

"As I said before, imagine the mess we would be in had Noha saved same sex specifies as opposed to a male and female of each. Yea right!"

His name is "Noah".

"Noah died 350 years after the flood, at the age of 950, the last of the extremely long-lived antediluvian Patriarchs. The maximum human lifespan, as depicted by the Bible, diminishes rapidly thereafter, from almost 1,000 years to the 120 years of Moses"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah

If you're going to argue using reason, then don't pelt us with balderdash resting on Biblical myth to try and prove your point.

It just looks ridiculous.

Reference my above post, please delete,

"'Perfect' (ie impossible) use of condoms for vaginal sex: 98%

Yeah we know Poirot you often support the sisterhood who hold the filthy creeds of the Emily's listers. Killing the unborn, selling their body parts and other gross doctrines. It would be interesting to know where else you glean your moral base from seen you are so quick to trash Scripture.

"Yeah we know Poirot you often support the sisterhood who hold the filthy creeds of the Emily's listers. Killing the unborn, selling their body parts and other gross doctrines. It would be interesting to know where else you glean your moral base from seen you are so quick to trash Scripture."

Off goes runner on another rancid little run-by because someone called out the Noah myth. OMG of course Noah lived to be 950 - and woe betide anyone who critiques such a fanciful load of old tosh!

He's dug down deep into his little book of vitriol...now Poirot often supports the sisterhood (stump up with evidence of a post on OLO when I've done such)...and by association, Poirot must support their "filthy" creeds.

Good old religiously-addled runner spits out the usual...anything that goes against the "runner code" or argues against his fundamentalist religious stance automatically becomes "filthy, gross, dirty, hate-filled, etc".

Get this straight, mate.

If you think I'm going to put up with your faux moral rectitude and take your baseless and derogatory insults lying down, then think again.

You're a mean spirited, closed-minded, vacuous troll on this forum....who spends a minimum of effort addressing issues and a maximum of effort pasting anyone with whom you disagree with the most vile epithets.

Now cough up the posts on this forum where I've defended "the sisterhood" or "Killing the unborn, selling their body parts and other gross doctrines" you mendacious little man.

' You're a mean spirited, closed-minded, vacuous troll on this forum....who spends a minimum of effort addressing issues and a maximum of effort pasting anyone with whom you disagree with the most vile epithets.'

and what a charming woman you are Poirot. Still unable to answer where your moral base comes from. No wonder you spit such venom on a regular basis. At least its towards me today giving Tony a break.