The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Australian Missile Defense Shield

Australian Missile Defense Shield

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All
The term "Defence Shield" is an illusion as you can always get past a shield. Just ask any aboriginal hunter who's curved boomerangs were able to flick passed an opponents shield if it hit it on the edge I understand.

Ned Kelly's iron shield did not work either as he was shot in the legs and captured.

In the USA if that countries air defence shield was so good how did S11 happen?
Posted by Adrian Jackson of Middle Park Vic, Tuesday, 12 June 2007 4:28:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
adrian, it's impolite to inject reality into the discussion of weapon systems.
Posted by DEMOS, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 7:51:42 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Adrian: "Countries" in the context you were using it is "Country's".
Posted by StG, Thursday, 14 June 2007 1:18:14 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Adrian; Missile defence shields are only really effective against medium, long range and ICBM's (someone correct if I'm wrong). In Australia's case they would be effective against Indonesian missiles and ship bourne...'cause we could prepare for the launch. Unlike if they were launched from an undetected Sub.

9/11 were civilian aircraft that took off from close proximity to the target. There are rules of engagement, and you can't just shoot something down if it is off course. By the time you figure out it's a threat, she's all over.

Missile defence shields would be actioned by alert status through political talks with potential threats. You can never be completely 'covered'.
Posted by StG, Thursday, 14 June 2007 1:34:28 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
StG,

Has anyone proved that so called missile "shields" work against incoming ICBM? Remember in 1991 (Gulf War)in Greater Palestine they had both SCUDS and PATRIOT debris raining down on both the Zionists and Arabs.

Yes the S11 attack did use civil aircraft which proves my point. Any nation can be dislocated by non conventional means (without missles). For example water reserves polluted or power and gas plants blown up.

This paranoid about Iran and North Korea is just that and is a distraction from the big picture that the "coalition of the will" now face - they failed in Iraq. No politician wants to admit that they failed so they keep sending more troops into the mincer in desperation.

As a former Liberal (1994-2003) that opposed the Iraq invasion in 2002/3 I can not wait to see the 2003 Howard Cabinet put on trial for war crimes. Incidentally, I joined the Liberals mainly to help Jeff Kennett get Victoria back onto the rails as Cain/Kirner also failed.

Adrian Jackson (Australian Regular Army Infantry Officer from 1972-1995)
Posted by Adrian Jackson of Middle Park Vic, Thursday, 14 June 2007 2:48:19 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"In Australia "Defence" is spelt with a "c" and not an "s" which is the Yank spelling." - Adrian

Yes, as you say above, but not when its a verb, methinks. No Fowler to hand.
Posted by Oliver, Friday, 15 June 2007 2:18:28 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy