Serves these people right, they choose to have a child in 'human made system' instead of the natural system eg. man + woman, for reproduction purposes.

So they suffer the consequences, but unfortunately the only one really suffering is the child. For all any of us know, that child may go on to excel in other areas of life like athletic achievement or artistic accomplishment etc. Just because the sperm donor was not what was advertised with academic prowess, etc, does not necessarily mean it's a failure. Remember, the child, like every other, only has 50% of that donor's contribution.

ROJAMA...

I only hope you're right ? Perhaps the child will go on to develop into a quality singer or dancer or whatever...? As far as the two 'lesbian-parents' - personally I couldn't give a stuff about them or their high price sperm clinic ! It's the welfare and happiness of this tiny little child, that counts in my book, the rest of 'em tough !

the child is always last especially among those who deny a child a mother or father. That is why they usually become militant and even violent in some pseudo 'moral' cause while condoning gross immorality.

Dear Runner

People are by nature, have 3 points:)....Eat..Kill..Babies:)..

"the child is always last especially among those who deny a child a mother or father. That is why they usually become militant and even violent in some pseudo 'moral' cause while condoning gross immorality"

Gezzzzz....Runner! Some might think science is a bad thing:)

Tall

Perhaps it isn't the science at fault but rather the use some make of it.

Psychologists studying adolescent boy and girl membership of gangs in the US have consistently found that a common precursor of gang membership is the fatherless family.

It turns out that the nuclear family so despised and dumped on by feminists and leftist 'Progressives' aka International Socialists is the best proof against gang membership.

Gang women demonstrate early-life exposure to abuse and parental crime for example drug taking, and father loss. A criminal parent multiplies the risks of abuse and victimisation leading to gang membership and similar criminal behavior and other crimes.

That is not to say that a child raised by a sole parent or in the subject case by lesbians will necessarily suffer deprivations and personal problems. However the odds are stacked in the favour of the child raised in a nuclear family where the father is present and there is no parental criminality (or one assumes rejection of authority).

This whole case is regrettable but humans today have grown away from the conventional means’ (meaning humans are branching out) into unknown territory… (Being the most people on the planet ever) “Perhaps it isn't the science at fault but rather the use some make of it.”
And perhaps you’re right OTB and the history of us all is well documented with trying new things that the last gen simply can’t understand for the life of them why that don’t fit in the general way of life as some wish to implement a degree of understandings to how a child is programed in the first place. “I could point a few fingers to the problems if it makes some feel better” but that’s not going to help this situation. Human DNA should be scanned before any birth takes place, but that’s only my opinion….

Tall