The Forum > General Discussion > CO2 Turbine Generator
CO2 Turbine Generator
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
Posted by Aidan, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 2:46:25 PM
| |
DaS Energy
The first law of thermodynamics says that you cannot create energy, thus to generate power from the non reactive CO2, you need to impart at least that amount of energy into the CO2. The second law of increasing enthalpy means that you can't get as much out as you put in. So unless you can provide an endless source of free compressed CO2, your system is worthless. Posted by Shadow Minister, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 2:55:50 PM
| |
DaS Energy,
The following is a link to The Science Florum thread discussing your overunity pseudoscience. I note that you were suspended by the moderator and that your claims were hammered and treated with the derision they deserve. You made even less sense to them than you do here. This link provides the thread comments in their entirety. At least until you were suspended that is. You seem obsessed with denying the laws of nature, why? http://www.thescienceforum.com/pseudoscience/32470-das-energy-overunity-pseudoscience.html Posted by spindoc, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 3:34:04 PM
| |
This looks very much like a re-run of DaS Energy's skirmish on www.thescienceforum.com/
A complete waste of time, except for the slightly uncomfortable humour value associated with observing someone who has such a bee in their bonnet, they cannot see how ridiculous they appear to others. Time to let this one slide into oblivion again, methinks. Posted by Pericles, Tuesday, 25 November 2014 4:16:47 PM
| |
Without commenting on the thermodynamics or the practicality of the CO2 Turbine Generator I would like to know how it is proposed to capture the CO2 to be used in the generator. It is not practical to extract it from the atmosphere. There are proposals to try and extract it from the exhaust gases of coal fired power stations but that is turning out to not be very practical.
Posted by denisaf, Thursday, 27 November 2014 1:21:25 PM
| |
Time to put this thread where it more properly belongs, "Humour & Satire"; and then it only just scrapes in.
Posted by Is Mise, Sunday, 30 November 2014 8:45:11 PM
|
"Aidan, China is doing very well with it thanks, It not require Geothermal heat, only a temperature greater then -30*C."
I understood you were claiming it was a more efficient way of generating energy from heat.
Was my understanding correct? (And if not, WTF are you claiming?)
Therefore, surely the issue isn't whether it requires geothermal heat, but whether the geothermal energy industry could benefit from it?