The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Don't Call Me A Problem!

Don't Call Me A Problem!

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 19
  7. 20
  8. 21
  9. Page 22
  10. 23
  11. All
Napoleon,

There seems to be many groupings for PCA, just which one did you mean?

I did find some reference to them on Stormfront but we should all know by now just how unreliable those whackos are when the word "race" is mentioned.

Horses and donkeys and zebras are of the genus 'equine' and can breed but the offspring are mules.
This does not happen within the human species, all offspring of human parents have the potential to be fertile and thus to breed fertile offspring.

The race Equs cannot breed with the race Felidae and sexual intercourse between them is highly unlikely although onesided gastronomic intercourse is common.

Basically, if members of a group can breed fertile offspring with members of another group then both groups are of the same race.
This was proven time and again in the USA during slave days when slave owners did a bit of add-on-investment by spreading their own genes among their movable property.
Posted by Is Mise, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 5:12:34 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
This does not happen within the human species
is Mise,
Are you sure ? Where then do the Lefties come from ? I'm certain they're a product of Labor & the Greens & some have advanced to asexual reproduction.
Posted by individual, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 6:38:40 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Is Mise, what you say "face immediate/imminent death if they declined the generous offers of employment" History does not actually support the assertion that the Nazi's had to hold a gun to some Jews head so they would act on their behalf. To quote from the following short article; "They were used by the Germans primarily for securing the deportation of other Jews to the concentration camps." "The Polish-Jewish historian and the Warsaw Ghetto archivist Emanuel Ringelblum has described the cruelty of the ghetto (Jewish) police as "at times greater than that of the Germans, the Ukrainians and the Latvians." Most believed that by cooperating with the Nazi's they themselves would escape the fate that they helped inflict on other Jews, but unfortunately for them, it wasn't the case.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Ghetto_Police
Posted by Paul1405, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 9:32:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Paul,

Certainly there were such people within the Jewish communities but they cannot be compared to the "Native Police" in Queensland.
They were rather obviously primarily driven by fear whereas the "Native Police" were driven by the desire for a good job and entered into the killing of their fellow Aboriginals with qualmless gusto.

Did the NAZIS trust the Jewish police with very efficient firearms?

The Aboriginal police were well armed and used their weapons to good effect.

Did NAZIS Officers trust their well being to the Jewish police?

European Officers went bush with their Aboriginal police detachments and thus placed themselves at the mercy of people of a different culture who were as equally armed or better armed.

No comparison really.
Posted by Is Mise, Tuesday, 17 June 2014 10:09:02 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Is Mise, I don't dispute what you say about the 'Native Police' in any war declared or undeclared, there are always collaborators, turncoats even mercenaries operating. The Romans made great use of mercenaries. I know during the Maori Wars in NZ some tribes, including my partners tribe, sided with the British. In all cases its done for a variety of reasons, not the least fear of the dominant power at the time, or simply for advantage of some sort. Depending on which side of the fence you sitting the 'Native Police' could be seen as good guys, or bad guys. Aboriginals are no different than any other people when comes to opposing your own people. There are always those ready, willing and able to help the enemy.
On of the most anti-aboriginals persons I ever come across, was an Aboriginal bloke who was very down on his own people, for drinking, for not working, all the regular reasons given. How does any of this relate to the topic, which in broad terms is about Aboriginal rights and welfare.
Posted by Paul1405, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 11:43:50 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy,

if the Labour governments that helped to give us Mabo and also Rudd’s “apology” were actually really serious, and I also include you and every other person who thinks they want to fix things,

why did the apology and Mabo specifically fall short of any concrete giving back [compensation] and rather camoflauges their true intent of indifference under weak, sparse and useless land reclaimations?
That is why hasn’t the average indigenous person in Redfern etc. been given some land? Which small section of the indigenous political elite [who mostly have no connection with on ground concerns in Ingigenous communities other than from the chair/office of the administrator of their government given sizable budget. Further I am quite sure that the majority of those indigenous leaders were either themselves children of the “stolen generation” or the direct descendants but specifically those who were adopted and raised by white middle class families [whereas most went to abuse dormatories like many British kids did also of same era.
I mention this detail as I think it is vital in the outcome of indigenous politics today. The leaders have been raised by a wealthier white class and specifically the families who thought they felt guilt and regret for past mistreatment of non-whites [likely by their ancestors directly and all their neighbours ancestors too – thus a reason they feel the ‘guilt’] since that mindset would have had an extremist religious type crazed drumming in of the same ideologies of the guilt and blame and how apparently ALL white people are completely responsible for the ills of ALL non-whites etc.

The extreme patronising and one-sided brainwashing has created “leftist” believing people who have some indigenous blood and thus can be proxied into being their puppet Aboriginal leadership
Posted by Matthew S, Wednesday, 18 June 2014 2:58:14 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 19
  7. 20
  8. 21
  9. Page 22
  10. 23
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy