The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Greens know how to live!

Greens know how to live!

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. ...
  13. 23
  14. 24
  15. 25
  16. All
Plenty of inventive diversions, but still no closer to resolving the mystery. It is quite a conundrum.

To re-state,

"It is a mystery that maybe readers of Vogue Living - Vogue Australia might have an answer for.

$414,000 to outfit an already plush Paddington executive suite. What did Greens Senator Larissa Waters find was so necessary as to cost that amount of taxpayers' dollars?

There was a trend of certain pollies a while ago to have theme like Egyptian fit-out. That cost an arm and a leg (taxpayer's arm and leg).

What manner of Vogue elegance costs $414,000?"
Posted by onthebeach, Monday, 21 April 2014 8:36:08 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
there is much..prattling on/at the other greenie warmist thread
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=16208&page=0

referring/in extacy..on their 'latest'..IN-GLORIOUS LINK
http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/sotc/sea_ice.html

,,..<<..Passive microwave satellite data reveal that, since 1979, winter Arctic ice extent has decreased about 3 to 4 percent per decade (Meier et al. 2006). Antarctic ice extent is increasing (Cavalieri et al. 2003),..but the trend is small.>>

AND NOW ITS NON EXISTENT
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=15257&page=38

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6292&page=0
YOU GUYS LIVE IN THE PAST/
the green carbon credit..scam..is winding down.
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=16076&page=0

its lobby will no doudt move onto some other moralizing regulation...sin-tax..cash cow..as scientists will always sell their souls for funding[and lets face it there is riches in taxing a weightless gas/by the ton..just like having a money tree.only you sell licences to polute...thats really catholic of you.

what motivates my anger is the one tax fixes it all
plus those 'in the know'..selling their free-solar cell power for three times the rest of us must buy it for..how low can you go..how much cash have you sold your soul..for>

YOU DONT TAX AIRPLANE FUEL..NOR SHIPPING DUEL
BETWEEN THOSE TWO..plus transport they use 2/3 rds the petro pollution

yet bug abusers still get the fuel tax excise exemption of 12 billion
yet these huge polluters still get govt cash..[so much for ya stinking lobby..you avoid taking on the biggest poLLuters

then all ya freaking lies..and the nutters keep coming and comming like greedy cash monkeys..seeking the next carbon credit fication[on stale data

your stinking models made absurd predictions
they were wrong/but because we dont resist you mongrels professionally the useful idiots keep parroting on the babble.

ITS YOU MUGS/HOLOW/CAUSE AFFIRMATIONS..THINKING WE BELIEVE YOU
when mostly their just ignoring your latest blaH BLAH BLAH

AND THEIR RIGHT.so what motivates you some greenie bonus points
or the cold hard cash they give you for fooling and foiling the opposition.

regardless you professing fools win/not by the science/but by persistence akin to rape..and the thief caught lying yet again
http://rss.infowars.com/20140421_Mon_Alex.mp3
and still you lot bounce back..pretending its true
then one day you going to look and see the fruit..of all you screwed

http://board.freedomainradio.com/page/books/the_handbook_of_human_ownership_a_manual_for_new_tax_farmers.html
Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 9:03:28 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Beach,

You are way off the track on this one. Other than one local rag from the Murdoch stable of gutter press, none of the reputable media outlets, such as the ABC or Fairfax, took up the story. Like any MP's office the department in charge gets the office up to standard. What we have here is excellent value for money for the taxpayer. Senator Larissa Waters being one of the best representatives in the parliament.
Possible you are a little bit peeved that your man Jim Slime failed to even get the deposit back at the last election. I do believe Larissa has put in for a 6' X 4' autographed photo of Bob (We Love you) Brown for the the new office. Before you jump onto your high horse and rile about it being a waste of taxpayers money. Note this, the cost of that lovely pic of Bob, is only $500 the exact same amount your man Dr. Slime forfeited at the last election, its a win win situation. Don't you love it.
p/s When it comes to spending a quid, I see your party HQ in Tempe (Sydney) is looking a bit grubby. could do with a spruce up. Sorry, nothing from the taxpayer for you.
Posted by Paul1405, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 12:09:15 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Paul,

Perhaps Anne Ruston, the Liberal Senator could
explain the cost of splurging $650,000 on her
regional office in South Australia. It makes Senator
Larissa Water's office splurge look miniscule in comparison.
Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 12:57:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
....Time for a tax revolt from all working people. None of those parasites deserve a another cent of our hard earned money. It's the only way to put a stop to all this leeching!

For years I have said we should engage a high profile accounting/law firm to hold our taxes for us, then release them once governmentS get it right. We would have paid our taxes, but have more say in how they are spent

Paul, my point is that how can a green minister use goods and chattels fir her office when they are extracted, made from the very goods they fight so hard to protect and ban the use of.

Either you're green, or you're not.
Posted by rehctub, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 1:08:43 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear rehctub,

Don't be upset.

We know what happens when you take a one-legged man's
crutch away.
He learns to hop. ;-)
Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 1:35:49 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. ...
  13. 23
  14. 24
  15. 25
  16. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy