Thank you Foxy,

Beach, Hasbeen, Spud let me remind you, in case you are under some illusion.

Eddie Obeid, Barry O'Farrell, Craig Thomson, Arthur Sinodinos, Ian Macdonald, just to name a few, are not, and never have been members of The Greens. If you are members, supporters, hangers on, lackeys, or sycophants of either the Liberal or Labor Parties, then you may well be supporting political parties with corrupt and dishonest representatives. These two parties, unlike The Greens do not have a good name, with the Australian people. Which are you chaps, Labor or Liberal?

I seem to remember the Greens' MsP in the NSW Parliament lying like pigs about one Brian Boyle and he having to have recourse to a Parliamentary Committee to get the truth to come out.

Only cowards lie about fellow citizens under the protection of Privelege.

Dear Is Mise,

I agree that only cowards lie about their fellow
citizens under the protection of parliamentary
privilege. And that means that all of our
politicians have a lot to answer for. Including
the current PM and his front-bench.

Foxy,

<<all of our politicians have a lot to answer for>>

But weren't you implying just one post ago that the Greens were above all that?

Most of us acknowledge that a lot of politicians do dishonest things.
But Paul has been tell us that the Greens are the exception.

You & Paul will have to put your heads together and get your alibi straight!

Dear SPQR,

Actually,

I was replying to your question about the
Greens by giving you the link on WA
Greens Senator Scott Ludlam who showed
the major parties how it should be done.
Read it - it's quite interesting.

Foxy,

Ok. Let's walk through the last few exchanges:

1) Paul says: "This garbage [ie the report of spending rort] is written in an attempt to discredit the good name of The Greens"
[Here 'good name'refers to the Greens supposedly behaving exemplary -- unlike all other parties]

2) Then SPQR & some others ask (paraphrased|) *What good name--has anyone heard about this*

3) Then Foxy pops up with --"Yes. Here's just one of many examples..."
what was that again? "Yes. Here's just one of many examples (of that good name)".
[Note in replying as you did you are supporting Paul's claim that the Greens are special/exemplary]


So yes, you were doing your best to deflect my question --but in doing so you were defending Paul's farcical claim that the Greens were squeaky clean