The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Saddam’s Economics

Saddam’s Economics

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All
Dear Spindoc,

There is a clear difference I feel between trying to spin a story that is built on flights of fantasy to have a dig at Labour, and taking the theme and stating facts to have a dig at the Opposition.

Anyway a Mining Tax 'bleeding away the nation's wealth'? You have got to be kidding me. Perhaps bleeding some of the obscene amounts of money spilling into the bank accounts of Clive, Gina and Twiggy and putting it to work in the Australian community.

Oops sorry, your side of politics believes taking anything from the wealthy is an anathema, after all Rupert and co were instrumental in getting your lot into power. Money goes a long way toward poisoning ethics, Saddam knew it. Rupert knows it. Clive, Gina and Twiggy know it, and your side of politics are very familiar with it.

And you want to be a cheer squad for that lot? Don't you have anything better to do?
Posted by SteeleRedux, Thursday, 13 March 2014 5:24:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi SteeleRedux,

Interesting that the “metaphor” I used is now a << flight of fantasy >> When are you going to stop chasing Unicorns and address the real issues?

You made a start on the mining tax, very brave. Now perhaps you could develop enough backbone to tackle the rest of the issues I nominated.

“ Gonsky, NDIS, NBN, Border Protection, Mining Tax, CO2 Tax, Fair Work Act, Union Shop EBA’s, ABCC, debt/deficit and red/green regulation”

Now that you have “responded” to the mining tax issue I look forward to your words of wisdom on the rest?

No doubt you will offer some choice moral/value judgments as all good progressives do, but eventually you will have to tackle the economics of each and that will stick in your craw.

I doubt you have the bottle or the smarts to do other than tickle the edges, but you could prove me wrong.

Just take a look at the value/moral response from OUG if you need evidence of progressive narrative nonsense. When push comes to shove the progressives are noted for heading for the emotive bunker, can you do any better?
Posted by spindoc, Thursday, 13 March 2014 6:48:17 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
BLAH BLAH SPIn quote..<<.The emotive bunker>>..<<..that will stick in your craw>>..because thats what spin/DOCTORING TROLLS Do

GENERALLY THe advice..is sound..IF THEY DONT REFUTE/THEY NAMECALL

do not feed the trolls

<<..Now that you have “responded” >>

<<.,can you do any better?>>

<<..No doubt you will offer some choice moral/value judgments as all good progressives do,>>

<<..Just take a look at the value/moral response from OUG if you need evidence of progressive narrative nonsense.>>

<<..I doubt you have the bottle>>*<<..<<or the smarts to do other than tickle the edges, ..When push comes to shove >>

SUCH A CLEVER TROLL..unsubscribe and remember THE TROLL
LOVES ATTENTION..BEING IGNORED IS THEIR GREATEST FEAR.

and be thankfull..YOUR NOT ADDicted
to feeding the fear/hate..spite demon..like THEY ARE.
Posted by one under god, Thursday, 13 March 2014 8:43:11 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Johan (OUG),

I was so impressed that you posted your deleted OLO hissy fits about me on your own blog. It almost sounds like you have adopted # 22 “Whenever the group is criticized or questioned it is characterized as "persecution".

Your adoption of victimhood suits you well, nice to see you fitting in somewhere in the global social fabric.

So many on OLO have seen you as a passive, reasonable and non-vindictive poster for so long, and are now finally seeing you for what you really are.

It’s interesting to watch the transformation, or should I say “flushing out” of those who have not previously been challenged. You have survived for so long on pseudo-intellectual nonsense that it must have come as a great shock to be exposed for what you really are.

You have buried the real YOU for so long under mountains of "SHOUTING, <<Pseudo/INTELLECTUAL>> , [aBBoTT) bashing NON-sense, DUCK/Sh*ng, {quasi-INTELLECTUAL}, << PRETEND/elite>> * [ unicorn/cHaSING], << NEAR/religious (closer to god), HIGH/moral [even closer to god] ramparts, link (infested) adopted OPINION**, [ CRITICAL/non-thinking], << appeal TO higher authority (even higher/THAN yours), << Platitude DRIVEN>>, ** RETORIC//based**, Social[ized], free/THOUGHTLESSNESS, << mALiGNENT**, << Spin/ducking>>, OFF [the Planet], @ progressive/I’M always/ slash/Left@, UNLESS! When I declare I’M ”right”, (only kidding), **I’m OK/really (except for the ODD, very ODD delusional, but self declared ** hey, we all make MISTAKES**, [KEEP up my medication (purely personal use YOU understand), [* DON’T confront me I’M vulnerable]*, << I’ve got GOD on my SIDE/SO watch out>>, And don’t YOU know** I CAN put a SPELL on (YOU) if you don’t watchOUT**.

On top of all this your Mum was always on your side, well supportive anyway, well she always stood up for me, well against the school “bullies” at least, well, well, well, at least I was not the ONLY one my family picked on!

OUG, your are an unmitigated fraud of the celestial kind. Nothing about you is “real”. You are just a figment of your own imagination and that of the GOD to whom you pretend to subscribe.
Posted by spindoc, Thursday, 13 March 2014 8:54:02 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear spindoc,

Come on mate you know better than that. I have addressed one of your so called 'well heads' and now you need to respond. Either defend your proposition or remove it from the list so we can move on.

Hopefully you choose the former because defending the indefensible is always entertaining for the other party.

So you playing or retreating?

Or are you too busy taking a big stick to OUG?
Posted by SteeleRedux, Thursday, 13 March 2014 10:59:22 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
STEELY/QUOTE..<<..So you playing or retreating?>>

CLEARLY THE LATER..I WAS GOING TO wait and see if he replies..TOO
BUT MUST CORRECT THE PERCEPTION..

<<..Or are you too busy taking a big stick to OUG?>>

OH IT WAS A Shtick../i was laughing out my guts..i thought it was SATIRE

WHAT STRUCK ME AS FUNNY..IS I WAS THE ONE SHOT..yet he was the one crying for a medic..[THE OTHER FUNNY BIT..was he was going to ambush..instead he did/then it didnt just disappear..and go away..it hangs around like a bird killed BY A DOG..HANGING AROUND HIS NECK..

ITS SAD REALLY..his words inspired the reply
just as much as his reply was inspired by mine
i appreciate his honesty..friends are too nice to tell the truth

actually..just in case it gets deleted[not by me]..
i best record it at the link..ANYHOW..WE AWAIT WITH BAITED BREATH

will spinner go the duck..or the bumpball hit the middle peg.
Posted by one under god, Friday, 14 March 2014 7:56:01 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy