The Forum > General Discussion > ABC and freedom of the Press
ABC and freedom of the Press
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Page 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
You obviously support those unions because their political bias concurs with your own.
However, in our Australian democracy citizens have a right enshrined in law to know who is behind the advertising. What you see as chummy union activism to overthrow of a government, even though you do not live in the subject State, others will see as grubby political interests with something to hide who are breaking the law of the land.
The unions or whoever is behind the political activism are thumbing their noses at the Department of Justice and Attorney-General, who are representing the people of Queensland. They have contempt for the law and for democracy.
Is that what you want? Do you want secrecy in political lobbying, in political donations, in electoral advertising, and in advertising generally? Do you favour union leaders who have such contempt for their members that thy refuse to consult with them, even where the law demands that they do?
It is interesting but entirely predictable that the Greens are keeping a low profile on this. But then there have been allegations for years concerning the links between the Greens and a secret squirrel anti-gun site which does not allow membership and hides its backers and a US billionaire currency dealer who nearly sent the Bank of England broke, which would have lost the life savings of thousands of small investors.
The public abhor secret interference in Australian domestic politics. It is the very antithesis of democracy. Citizens have a right to know who is behind it.
As well, these unions are hiding information from their own members and refusing to consult with them. That is something the federal Royal Commission into the union corruption would likely be coming up with as a finding on the prevailing corruption: that the unions concerned hid information from members and did not see themselves as answerable to their members - nor to the law for that matter.
These are the same old problems evidencing all of the time: unaccountable union heavies doing what they like with members' money and union policy.