Loudmouth,

I find it highly amusing that you, as a self-proclaimed champion of feminine honour and integrity, delight so much in reproducing Mr Slippers "mussel" reference.

Such as here:

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5855&page=0#165103

Here:

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5616&page=0#155295

and, of course, here:

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5901&page=0#167000

Why, Joe, you've employed that reference more than Slipper himself.

Still, it's in a similar realm as your penchant for deploying the word "sweetie" when you're either patronising a woman or find yourself out-gunned in debate with one - or both.

Not surprising at all, in fact...."Mr Feminist".

Cheers

: )

sonofgoin,

re: your last post.

The point I made in this earlier post was that MP's and Senator's are "usually" afforded the opportunity to repay - and life carries on.

Not so for Mr Slipper.

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5901&page=0#166887

P, point taken. You could draw some cross refernce as to how they stitched Pauline Hanson up, to the letter of the law.

SOG you are aware it was Tony Abbott who went for the throat of Hansen?
Be interesting if he was to need her vote IF she wins her senate seat.
Not that it would be of much use to him in opposition.

Belly>> SOG you are aware it was Tony Abbott who went for the throat of Hansen<<

Yes I know, after all he was the attack Dalmatian before he changed his spots.

But in fairness china, Hanson had Labor and the Libs in coalition for the scalp of the Australia Party. This is a two party system and that is how they want it.

Sorry, Poirot, I'll leave your friend Slipper alone from now on ;)

Cheers,

Joe