Ye (non existant) gods! So now the bible bashers are claiming the high moral ground by refering to some pre-historic cave graffiti! Tell me BOAZ_david, have you ever noted the many and varied sexual practices mentioned in and condoned by the book of Hebrew myths?

GYM-FISH... just a minor point..the Bible 'reports' many behaviours, but does not 'condone' that which is sinful. (read Kings and Chronicles for evidence)

PEPPY.. I'm not sure why u seem to be so upset. I'm simply reporting facts and on this issue a radio program and am using that to illustrate the importance of a Divine Standard, something which you as supposedly a Muslim should support 100%.

PERICLES on the issue of 'judgement' please realize, I'm judging 'a faith' which in Biblical terms is 'another gospel' which Paul refers to as follows in Galatians 1.9

"As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed!"

I don't recall 'cursing' fellow Human or Peppy, but you might consider using this verse as a counter to my own claim about Islam 'cursing' Jews and Christians ? I would have a ready answer though I assure you.

BACK to Cave Sex. My point ....again, is that 'unrestrained' natural man will diverge from Gods standard in many directions. He will indeed make it up...as he goes. Just like the Israelites "In those days there was no king in Israel, and every man did what was right in his own eyes" Judges 21:25

I created this thread, because I'd never heard the information about the behavior of geographically diverse early mankind, and it struck me as confirming the sad and morally degenerate inner nature of natural man.

Disagree, be hurt, be offended, even insulted, but thats not my intent. I'm making a point, and trying to support it with a report from those who have no Christian axe to grind, thus making it less 'tainted' by spiritual presuppositions

Boazy: " I'm simply reporting facts and on this issue a radio program ...

...I'm making a point, and trying to support it with a report from those who have no Christian axe to grind, thus making it less 'tainted' by spiritual presuppositions"

Perhaps you might have some hope of people believing you if you'd provide some information about the radio program that you claim prompted this silly thread. Since you seem to be refusing to provide such information when asked politely, I'm increasingly beginning to think that this is yet another case of Boazy "making it up as he goes" with respect to simple facts.

I think it's likely that Boazy invented this supposed "radio story". He is, of course, free to refute that suggestion by providing, the date, approximate time and program on Radio National that he heard the apparently salacious story upon which his post was based.

If he can't do that, we'll just have to conclude that he's telling porkies yet again.

CJ...humble apologies, I did respond, but had a computer crash half way through from memory and it got 'lost'.... when I came back later, I guess I thought I'd responded.

TIME Monday 1st appox 12.00 midday. 1026 khz AM ABC News Radio.

I rang the ABC and when the recorded message said "We will get back to you in approximately 5 days" I gave up.

I'm thinking that it was part of a program which did not carry a title sounding like Cave Sex.

No..not a porkie :)

I suppose I should thank Boazy for finally responding, albeit in his typically prevaricating way.

So the item upon which this entire discussion was on ABC News-Radio, as opposed to Radio National (which was Boaz's initial claim to credibility with respect to this subject). Unfortunately, there's no way of verifying this, nor of downloading the program as Boazy invited us to in his initial post in this thread.

Did anybody else listen to this program about prehistoric cave art depictions of outlandish sexual behaviour? Or can they otherwise corroborate Boazy's descriptions of homosexual group sex, bestiality etc?

Given Boazy's record of telling porkies and taking extreme liberties with the truth, I'm inclined to conclude that this whole thread is based on a fantasy concocted by him. He is both reticent and apparently unable to provide verifiable details of the supposed story which is the basis of the thread which he intiated.

I would really like to know more about this story. It's an interesting topic about which I used to have some small amount of professional knowledge. However, that's also another reason that I think that Boazy's making this story up - or at best, embellishing something he heard somewhere else by giving it ABC imprimatur.

Anyway, I think this whole thread is so much more Boazy bulldust, in this case designed to provide a platform for the expression of his peculiar sexuality. At least it provides some respite from Muslim-bashing, I suppose.

Prove me wrong, Boazy. All you have to do is back up your story.

Sorry, where I wrote "the item upon which this entire discussion was on ABC News-Radio", I meant to say

"the item upon which this entire discussion was based, was purportedly broadcast on ABC News-Radio"