Thanks Ludwig,

Fantastic images and a great way to pass a wet and windy day.

Some of the comments (and other images) are also uplifting.

Have to say though, hard to beat this clash of minds ...

runner

>> lefties always find a way to excuse the inexcusable. Not surprising. <<

Poirot

>> I excuse you, runner. <<

runner

>> Thanks Poirot but unfortunately you are not qualified to do so. Only Christ is. <<

Well, there you have it, straight from one who should know ... Christ is a "leftie".

And I always thought runner was down on lefties, perhaps he's really a closet leftie after all :)

bonmot
'And I always thought runner was down on lefties, perhaps he's really a closet leftie after all :) '

actually bonmot both those on the left and right and everywhere in between desperatley need a Saviour.

<< But don't underestimate the power of a blank page. >>

Indi, I’ve been thinking about this for several days. I might know what you mean, but as with quite a few of your one-liners over the last few years, I’ve struggled to be sure of what you are getting at.

Could do the Pauline Hanson bit: please explain.

Thanks

*desperatley need a Saviour*

Ther real worry here, Runner, is the implications of what you are claiming. You seem to be saying that people do kiddie porn or become violent, because they don't have a "saviour".

So is that your worldview? ie, that you would be doing kiddie porn and be violent, if you did not have your "saviour"?

To me, the very notion that you only don't do these things because
of your religious belief, is itself something to be concerned about.

don't worry Yabby moral relativist are far more likely to justify child porn and every other abomination as you probably know. Just read some of the above post and you might get it.

Oh I clearly get it, Runner. Your saviour stops you from doing kiddie porn and stops you from being violent.