Rechtub you actually do not do too bad at emissions your self bloke.
See no one wants to talk football, so lets forget my team dead in the water again.
But watch those blues go!
Keep away from the plane door need to see you home safe!

J, you're such a toss a joke is quite often funny, but only the once.

Belly, You are right, I do create a few emissions, however, I also provide materials that store carbon for decades.

As for the footy, just goes to show how good Benny was. He took Canbera to the finals, then the bronks, then your beloved dragons, now he's making inroads with the nights.

He truly is a super coach, up their with the late great Jack Gibbson.

Mate, I will have a great trip, have been advised the max temp will be minus 3Dc, so I may not leave the room yet.

As for the origin, I hope I get to see a replay at least, but either way it is sure to be a cracker and the blues will win or loose it in the first 20 min.

Cheers

We are definitely slugging the wrong culprit. Bloody Mother Nature produces and cycles through 750 gigatons of co2 each year without our help.

Humans produce 29 gigatons of co2 each year.

Tax nature, change natures habitual production and use of co2, then we would have nothing to worry about….we will be dead and gone. No co2 no life. Horrible bloody stuff, as bad as oxygen.

Well, sonofgloin, it's really all about balance - and tipping points.

sonofgloin, I heard somewhere along the line that a single volcanic eruption, emits the equivalent of years of human emissions in anyone eruption.

I would also suggest that we have a huge increase in food animals, globally, that all produce CO2.

I would also like someone to explain what caused the ice age and, is what we are seeing just another phase of the planets cycle.

But back to topic, if the end users were to achieve an average reduction of just 10% of our usage, which is generated through the burning of fossil fuels, I am sure that would make a more substantial difference than a tax that has to first be calculated, then collected, then redistributed.

Free, or next to free public transport would be one area to start, instead, we see increases in the order of 15%. that's after a multi million dollar camp to get people to use the services.

Quite simply, most people have lost trust in most governments.

rehctub>> But back to topic, if the end users were to achieve an average reduction of just 10% of our usage, which is generated through the burning of fossil fuels, I am sure that would make a more substantial difference than a tax that has to first be calculated, then collected, then redistributed.<<

I have said this before and it still stands. The globalists who are at the core of the worlds geopolitical manipulations are also the corporate moguls and bankers.

They have deftly moved the blame the cost and the guilt of modernity onto the consumer with their puppet like manipulation of the global green movement, one that every sixteen year old sees as our saviors. They have got us taxing co2 while they exploit resource and defile the environment without one protester standing vigil at their factory gates. They manufacture from factories with outdated and cheap emission technology pumping bile into our seas and waterways every second of the day all over the world again no protesters. This is saving them BILLIONS upon BILLIONS on R&D and real environmental rehabilitation because the global green movement has targeted the consumers and not the polluters. God isn’t that good luck.
TBC