The Forum > General Discussion > The circumcision debate.
The circumcision debate.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I did read about the man, aged 40, who was in the rare
position of having been both uncircumcised and
circumcised. He was cut at 33 because his foreskin
kept splitting, causing infections. The operation
didn't hurt, but when the anaesthetic wore off, he was
sore for about 24 hours and the stitches were in for a
month.
After the stitches were removed the man explained how
his sex life improved tremendously. However what I
found interesting was that despite this - he said that
he would not circumcise his son unless there were good
medical reasons for doing so.
Something to think about.
Dear Shadow Minister,
Thank You for being so open and honest. Both my sons have
been circumcised. They were born in Los Angeles - where we
lived and worked for about 10 years. And at the Cedars/Sinai
Hospital - this was done automatically (for health reasons)
we were not even asked. Americans firmly believe in circumcision
and their hospitals do it as a regular procedure. My
sons have not had a problem with it.
However, as I stated earlier - I shall present all the information
to my niece and leave the decision up to her and her husband.