The Forum > General Discussion > Please fill out survey on the live cattle trade?
Please fill out survey on the live cattle trade?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
Posted by laurenrosanna, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 8:55:50 AM
| |
i dislike in confidence info
that will set adgendas...or otherwise be used to do what? one page?[only too easy] male[gender] age[lol] 3[yes watched a bit of the first one] 4[yes aware of SOME of the media's issues] 5[do you believe the cattle’s welfare..should continue to be compromised?]..loaded question no means of gaining informed comment but once you know im one or the other who knows that? 6..Animals Australia say that this has been proposed before..[stunguns] Do you Believe: Stun guns..and policies will solve it? all the laws in the world cant change..what people do enforcing them is impossable able to be subverted by adgenda's 7.. Another debate..is whether the cows"".. i thought they were castrated bulls[ie steers] cows? ""should be killed..more ethically in Australian abattoirs then sent oversea"" nice idea but they dont got refrigerators they want local jobs..not driving on poor roads..delivering frozen carcuss into unrefrigerated custom,. ""rather than putting the animals through the stress of the live shipment."" ""Do you agree with this statement?"" in an ideal world..sure,.. but onto barely civilised people [it gets close to implying racist bias [we kill *neater..than you][were better killers] then they loose the other resources and the jobs refining..'product'..like render blood skins hooves horns oh i get it your duplicating civilisation making consumers..by taking away their jobs? eat processed foods[processed here bought there..by work/working..[on what?] you just took their raw asset..their job. Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 7:21:11 AM
| |
I have completed your survey Lauren.
Cheers Posted by Ludwig, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 9:44:05 AM
| |
im normally against surveys
[cause these innocent questions...go onto official records] i note the link goes to a 'survey' site and that you..[likely]..had to virtually..sign over all rights 'to the survey'..or its propritory rights im presuming the site auto colates the results by sex age etc..[and what %..is only based on the numbers][as respondants[and there we face the bias inherant in lazey reporting[based on spurilous survey results] when full frank open two way..*diss-cuss-ion can resolve more problem/quicker we akll got opinion but opinions can be modified [by such things as peer presures../via a survey] a few extra..on one side or the other..scews the results yet results...are definitive..in a definitive percentage [representing all of us][but most of us not in the least] not reflected [in survey samples are those..[who couldnt care less] your survey result..will all be a same opinionated type [the type that take surveys]..and the silent majority? well..*[dont matter] cause we got a %-age info is money but discussion solves the problems often before they start [how hard is it to sample wether the animal died under stress...] the abusers thus are found and re educated remember..that they do to the least[ie the beast] they will be doing to the wife and kids[after you take their jobs] there is so much more than our civil standards people only try to 'save the world''.. once they dont need to think..[worry/fret]..*where their next meal comes from.. these poor people..hunt their native wildlife..[for meat] our cattle..saves them killing unique animals..for meat at the last topic i suggested a prayer a simple prayer[autherised by their religeous masters] can avert much of the cruel[done by ignorants].. teach them [dont judge them] its easy to see something is wtrong but what is the remedy[cure]..not just the quick fame fix Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 9:54:04 AM
| |
dont take this personally
but it often happens...things join together [in that spirit]..i submit this..[for your research/disscussion/survey..] Rescue A Sick Horse, Cage A Sick Human,..Shoot A Healthy Pig Government Working For You People so worried about "animal rights" that they want to put humans in cages: http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/03/24/2049147/idaho-humane-society-sheriff-rescues.html#storylink=misearch Check the comments. They pat each other on the back for caring so much about the horses, they don't mind at all if the Sheriff defends the horses..*at the expense of the human. What oath did he swear, anyway? It occurs to NO ONE to help the people who need help, even though it would be the best for the animals AND the people. Even neglected animals[and humans] usually love their master,..you know? But this heroic effort by law enforcement..to protect animals only applies to sick ones,..it seems. ..f the animal is healthy and well cared for, the State will come shoot it and arrest the owner. Think I am kidding? http://whatreallyhappened.com/Idaho%20Statesman,%20Natural%20News http://www.activistpost.com/2012/03/america-ranks-1st-among-western-nations.html Michael Rivero of http://www.whatreallyhappened.com Watch entire 2012-03-26 Broadcast here: http://www.justin.tv/michaelrivero/b/312945259 Ken O'keefe of http://worldcitizen.uk.net/ and http://alohapalestine.com/ Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 10:13:52 AM
| |
its worth reading past posts
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/search.asp?cx=partner-pub-0168091956504304%3Ayb7rk7-ta83&cof=FORID%3A11&ie=windows-1252&q=live+cattle+export+ban&sa=Search&siteurl=forum.onlineopinion.com.au%2Findex-general.asp&ref=forum.onlineopinion.com.au%2Fthread.asp%3Fdiscussion%3D5051 the issue arises every now and again [when other destractions are needed to break the news cycle] its a great issue like that today or tommorrow..its in the can..ready to go at a minutes notice to reset the news cycle however...back to the subject [durn i shoulda posted the prayer here] http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12112&page=0 oh well im over it till we walked a mile on an empty gut..to try to find food ] for that screaming child..[children]..and the wife or your village we cant cast stones our grandparents thought worse [they treated humans..like beasts] and their beasts much worse [i recall when you had to break the beast leg's after you caught it..[not kill it..cauise the meat would spil before you got it home [ok beast is a high call. but they break wings of fowl;...we truelly are nasty mabe greenies are right..annilate the lot..[of the human race] the prayer was so good [i just fail to recall it] it basicly advised the beast there is a god we need food..and he now can evolve spiritually into a higher incarnation..[all hurts will be relieved] [prepare to be birthed... into your next life][as best suits your evolved nature] god supports all living our lives that we do to the beast..wwe do to god Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 10:36:38 AM
| |
occurs to me
many dont believe in re-incarnation they forget the king in the bible who was a beast in the field for 8 years or of the chrisna 'god's' turned into trees it makes sense that spirits.. need to work up to 'human..incarnation and can fall back into the best incarnation [god gives us the 'life/body'..that best serves our wants if we got a beastly nature..well here..now your a beast] we may be entertaining angels unaware all life is sacred..cause science dont know how it happend hasnt a theory let alone a name or description..[of the first 'life'] natural selection means science didnt! evolution is what heppens.. when god grants our base desires cant you see 'human nature' often reflexts their [previous beastly..incarnation ie note angry man..see his previous beastly nature return] spirit we are to spirit we return teach the animals their life revieuw.. on the journey..to..their next incarnation.. god bless you now be free to follow your nature god will give you..the body that best serves..your spiritual needs if you yearn for it yearn no more take these broken wurds and heal the wurld..one beast at a time Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 10:58:06 AM
| |
I did the survey, honestly gave my opinion.
I think animal welfare is of huge importance. But have no trust in vegans. Or the suburban house wifes who drive these things. Man has always eaten meat. The first was killed and eaten raw. Maybe one day some animal was eaten after being killed in a fire. And we learned to cook it. How did we kill mammoths, with stun guns? Honestly wish vegans would stop eating vegetables before cooking them. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 1:39:47 PM
| |
The thing is, this topic is far too complex for most suburban people to understand and the law of unintended consequences is all over it.
Ban live cattle and you could land up with far more animal suffering then you ever imagined. Only it won't be filmed by the city based vegan groups, as they think that they actually achieved something. The thing is, even now as it stands, the Northern station numbers are a touch and go affair to keep them viable. Ban live exports and they won't be able to afford what they need to maintain the cattle. They will die a miserable death, unseen by those well meaning city folks Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 2:11:51 PM
| |
survey completed.
Posted by diver dan, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 2:15:36 PM
| |
Yabby:
You are indeed too kind in your comments! Posted by diver dan, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 2:18:53 PM
| |
yabby,
I agree If Lauren is doing this project for year 12 that means she is 17 or so. Many teens are idealistic and most grow out of it after a bit more life experience and practical living. Vegans, like the Greens, never seem to have practical concepts. Just hope her teacher of politics is a practical person. Posted by Banjo, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 2:31:33 PM
| |
Banjo, yup but its not just teens. Right now some of the farming forums are being flooded by wellmeaning city housewives, who are going to show it to those mean and greedy farmers. Frankly they don't have a clue about the realities of farming, as their comments
show. So they go to websites like AA, totally misunderstand what some of figures actually mean and completely misunderstand what its all about. I'll give you an example. Everyone who has run livestock knows that if you run them in numbers, you will get some deaths. For all sorts of reasons, from snakebite, lambing issues, bloat, various diseases, blowflies etc. If you change their diet and put them into a feedlot, even with all the hay, oats, lupins, minerals and the rest, you will get some losses from things like acidosis, as the rumen adjusts. You can buffer with bovatec, bicarb of soda etc, but you still get odd cases. So 1% losses in a feedlot and 5% losses in the paddocks, are commonly accepted figures, unless we introduce medicare for livestock. Livestock vets understand all this, its quite complex. Yet our city housewives are convinced that the 1% of sheep which have a problem on a ship, are major animal cruelty. Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 3:20:18 PM
| |
I refuse to fill out such an inept survey.It has no depth of analysis to it and has questions that pander to the inate bias of it's creator.
Posted by Arjay, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 4:04:37 PM
| |
Here are the answers:
1. Gender? Male 2. Age: 60+ 3. Have you watched the ABC Four Corners report last year (2011) by Animals Australia about the cruelty in Indonesian abattoirs? Some of 4. If not, are you at all aware of the news reports and issues surrounding the live shipping of Australian cattle to countries such as Indonesia? Yes 5. After the release of the first report about cruelty on four corners, live cattle export was suspended by the Gillard government for 3 months. Considering the $700 million-a-year live export industry pays wages for many farmers and injects wealth into the Australian economy, do you believe the cattle’s welfare should continue to be compromised? Yes 6. The agricultural minister, Joe Ludwig suggests stun guns can be implemented into Indonesian abattoirs and systems will be put into place to track and monitor animal abuse. Animals Australia say that this has been proposed before and nothing has changed and nothing will change unless all live trade is stopped – a statement backed by multiple volunteers who have witnessed the mistreatment. Do you Believe: Don’t care 7. Another debate is whether the cows should be killed more ethically in Australian abattoirs then sent overseas rather than putting the animals through the stress of the live shipment. Do you agree with this statement? Don't care 8. Any further opinions on the matter? No Posted by stevenlmeyer, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 4:34:57 PM
| |
I do not think we can be sure what the author thinks, or that we need to insult her.
But yabby Banjo Steven and was it hasbeen I agree. Even with yabby, and mine from above, use of the term housewife's. No chance ever a City animal health and welfare activist can understand the reality's of country life. Just imagine, if this trade dies, hundreds of thousands of cattle die horrible deaths . Or we become up to our arm pits in cattle. Who cares for prawns? I eat a lot of them, boiled to death at sea, too hard for stun guns! And chooks, hung up side down and their heads cut off! Who truly cares, lets feed the hungry first Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 4:45:35 PM
| |
Never been a fan of live export. Should be processed in AU.
Done survey. Posted by 579, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 4:47:17 PM
| |
Perhaps Lauren could address an issue which more city people might
understand a bit about and where I for once agree with the Greens and 80% of the public. Why do the two major political parties insist that we torture some old people in palliative care, against their wishes, for weeks, months and years, until they gasp their last breathe, all in the name of religious dogma. Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 5:01:55 PM
| |
I filled out your survey. What's your take on this one ?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-03-09/inquiry-launched-after-dugongs-butchered-alive/3879014 Posted by individual, Wednesday, 28 March 2012 7:16:51 PM
| |
579, any chance you have lived in the bush.
Are you informed on the cattle and meat exports, the differences and how we first started our meat exports. Do you understand the economics behind this part of our exports. And the religious complications? We first exported cracker cows,ex dairy cattle to the USA for hamburger mince, this was meat. And mostly from the east coast, then black baldys, product of milking cows and Heraford bulls. Out in out back QLD NT, WA SA, these exports are what our customer wants, for now, soon we will need new markets. Ever thought about a meat export being started up in the true outback? the costs, transport,who would work there while miners pay twice the money else ware. Do not clutch leftist dreams to your chest in miss placed solidarity. This issue, if we let it, transfers the pain and suffering, from cattle to our producers. Yabby, mate, while it may be our young lady thinks as you think she does. It is counter productive to take to her,remember in our youth, mine for sure, we did not fully understand some issues. Catch more flys with honey than bitterness. Posted by Belly, Thursday, 29 March 2012 4:45:50 AM
| |
Belly I have always lived in the country, worked in abattoirs for 15 years, All live export done for anyone was to shut abbs; down.
We killed Hallal, and worn out dairy cows for America, and chilled beef for Japan, and bull meat for russia. To value add is far better than send live. I don't like to see animals die uncomfortably, at least they must be supervised, on their slaughter style in foreign countries. These outback cattle are transported to port, and that is where an export facilities should be. So nothing changes. My comment was not meant to be political. Posted by 579, Thursday, 29 March 2012 7:17:04 AM
| |
That demand for Australian frozen meat in Indonesia has dramatically fallen indicates that this alternative is a pile of dung.
This was a slap in the face for the Indonesians and a foreign affairs disaster. Posted by Shadow Minister, Thursday, 29 March 2012 8:43:08 AM
| |
Fair go, folk.
So it's not a perfect questionnaire, as surveys go. Yes, it does display some bias, and yes, the question on cattle welfare being compromised is ambiguous. If laurenrosanna is able to learn from it, and put together a project that in the end is better informed than it was at the start, that is all we need to know. Taking potshots at what you presume are the biases in the survey, or vegans, or "suburban house wifes", or idealistic teens etc. is cheap, and unnecessary. Give it a rest. Do the survey. Move on. Posted by Pericles, Thursday, 29 March 2012 8:51:14 AM
| |
*Taking potshots at what you presume are the biases in the survey, or vegans, or "suburban house wifes", or idealistic teens etc. is cheap, and unnecessary.*
Pericles, that is very sweet and feelgood of you, but there is nothing wrong with called a spade a spade, in fact its what good debate should be all about. Given the massive attempt by AA to influence those urban housewives and so many of them being sucked in, with severe implications to agriculture, its quite reasonable in fact, for agriculture to point these things out. If they were doing everything possible to destroy your livelyhood and accused you of being a cruel, heartless and greedy bugger, I am sure that you would defend your position when the topic came up for discussion and would have more to say, then just fill out a survey. If young and idealistic people have been hoodwinked, its quite reasonable to explain why and by whom and to debate the points at issue. In fact, it can only help them further understand the issue a bit better. Posted by Yabby, Thursday, 29 March 2012 9:20:06 AM
| |
"This survey is not perfect" is a vast understatement.
This survey is designed to elicit a particular response, that is unlikely to reflect the views of the public. Lauren should just save us all the time and fill it out herself. Posted by Shadow Minister, Friday, 30 March 2012 6:50:29 AM
| |
Anybody seen the "traditional" killing of a turtle with a poorly aimed concrete block & the cutting up of the beast whilst still alive ?
How about expressing some views on that. Posted by individual, Sunday, 1 April 2012 9:45:39 AM
| |
Individual, yup I saw the original story on tv, amazingly cruel.
They were cutting off the turtles flippers whilst still alive. We had an issue in another meatworks right here, a couple of months ago, where staff were being really cruel to cattle and bashing pigs to death with a metal bar. I am all for addressing these issues, all for less cruelty, all for helping improve animal welfare in the third world as well and we could do alot. After all, we've just given the Indonesians 20 million $ to help improve their own beef production. Why not spend a part of that on animal welfare issues and slaughter methods? Which brings me to my bone to pick with AA and other vegan groups. They are just so totally focussed on the live trade, perhaps because it results in lots of donations to their websites, as they are all rattling the proverbial tin online. Yet when we look at the more objective data, we see that alot of their claims are complete nonsense. Most animals actually gain weight on the trip. In some of the ME sheep feedlots, they even have chilled water available for the sheep, to keep them content. Yes they don't all use stun guns, however some do. But a quick slit to a sheep's throat and its all over in three or four seconds. I can only hope that my death will be as quick one day. For in the end, we all face a tragic end, both animals and humans Posted by Yabby, Sunday, 1 April 2012 10:23:08 AM
| |
that reminds me
shark fin soup...[cutting the fins off living fish then throwing the rest away]...yes that too makes me angry boiling lobsters/prawns killing living seeds to make flour yep so much murder and mayhem thats why its wise to pray over our food that died..so we can live as jesus said more belessed the lion become man than the man become lion so much to get angry about: by catch..! dumping deep oceon vent mining even...'killing cain toads' what part re 'thou shalt not murder' dont ya get? someone should make them survey questions [its big news...;soon] Posted by one under god, Sunday, 1 April 2012 10:56:51 AM
| |
Yabby,
I have witnessed a few turtles being stunned by a blow to the nose/beak before being cut up. This is a reasonably humane practise but not common. It is to keep the blood flowing to clear the flesh. In that video the blokes were obviously not too concerned as one was even giggling when the other bloke threw the concrete block. Many indigenous were pretty angry at this themselves. Posted by individual, Sunday, 1 April 2012 10:56:55 AM
| |
stevenlmeyer,
SNAP! Same answers as me! Posted by Houellebecq, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 8:54:01 AM
| |
monsanto has rights to pig genes
they are putting presure on pig breeders everryone puts presures on breeders but heck show me an investment..that returns 100 fold each year one sow=factor of 12 one chicken=return on investment times 100 one seed..can grow millions of seed's life is so amasing[its diversity glories god] its sameness insults god we all basicly eat..the same tasteless veg/fruit but can seasilly grow our own...[in an old chook pen;possum proof] so muxch good stuff to talk about why this focus on personalised sin...a poor guy need to account to god he will get 70 fold return for every kick lump bump...untill he realises ..its silly and repents and then the long lost son return's to love and home no hommer..but home Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 9:31:53 AM
|
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CTC6JRJ