noted that that abc news thingy at 6 pm
girly blonde quoted 300 per day die..from smoking
its so neat and clever..one makes up the numbers as they go

the other taxes..it as fast as they can
to give it to the lobby...to make up more clever numbers

but the essential point is
the rates at which smokers and non smokers 'get' cancers
[and die of 'smoking related disease'..is THE SAME*

to wit smoking..isnt a facter
[its insane to claim that pasive smoking
kills..the same ratio's as smoking]

its just an attributable cause..for a new spin statistic
cause the clubs protect their legal drug killing millions[booze..ya cant loose][govt loves you]

now lets tax lollies
and poluters[truckies]
but oh no they will fight back
heck an insane drunk might even glass ya

bhetter we bully smokers
make them feel guilt blame shame
and index their tax[we got our tax without any input]

but others..the 'stakeholderrs get inputs]
be they miners poluters farmers fishure's of men[media]
or just carbon tax collecters or speculaters...financiers lawyers bankers or beuro/roc-rats..

oug

Deaths from cancer may be the same, but smokers have a lower life expectancy: How can that be if smoking is not harmful? Yet the silly pollies would rather you smoke tobacco than an electronic cigarette, which is yet to have a death pinned to it despite its millions of users. What sense is there in banning something when there is no evidence of harm?

i agree with your words..re that e cigarette ban
its insane...its smokeless..it does what it is designed to do
[deliver a hit..of a legal drug]

but mate its so much better putting ciggie butts into sugar gum
and getting huge drug prices [plus govt subsidies]..for lollies

how easy is that
rocks-on...served her legal drug overlords well

but mate lets egsamin...the ATTRIBUTABLE smoking deaths
half are NON smokers!..so that huge 15,000..becomes 7500

i think that is closer to the suicide numbers
that are higher than the road death numbers

many addicted to smoking
are also addicted to booze
so as the insurance industry would point out
there is no direct causal link...what the higher carcinogen?

see we cop hysteria...to get new taxes
the earth is warming/cooling/changing
lets tax one cause of it

there are many roads to cancer
from over eating..to inhaling dust laden air polutants
the kety being...who caused it really..[not just who is attributable]

polititions are just there..to serve their moneyed elite/masters
be they lawyers..cleaning up on cannabis plants being drugs
with one/percent of the population..paying their 'tax' every year..
or be they docters franchised with lawfull drug pads..

thing is bullies..will bully
and shy polititions..dont touch the real criminals

noting once upon a time prostitution
and gambling..was illegal..but the drug pimps
and the money marketeers..selling booze and pokies
tab gambling...and heavey hooking...franchise

well they need...'bigger threats'..
to keep po/ice..courts..govt ammused

and out of..their own business...blaming addicts...
not real the crims..subverting the acts of state
with consistant media spun/lies and nanny taxes