there is much difference..bewetween words and works
all good leaders have good works..

where good works are
good words follow

to give an egsample
here is words

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4792&page=0

they reveal..the works of an honest man
upon whom..the unspoken words of the vile..in their works..remained mute..

im over using many more words

by our works will we be judged
not upon the silenced utterance's from our
vile heart murmerings..realised[made real]..via our viler lips

It's simple enough- stop voting for parties where the candidates have been of recent past, corrupt, and only here for the gravy train.

The truth is, every party applicant goes through a rigorous screening process by its members- and they would easily pick up careerism in everyone they recruit- but they are more concerned that their candidates think the same way they do (which often includes supporting them when they do the wrong thing). Either way, for them to allow such people proves they have no problem if their members aren't here to do their jobs.

In other words, simply stop voting for the Liberals (Abbot, Turnbull), Labor (Keating, Gillard, Iemma, Carr, Kineally), The Nationals (Joyce, Crook) and the Democrats (all the members that sold Telstra).

Look at your remaining candidates and start checking them out.

Whether for good or ill leaders set the example (and leaders need to be aware of this).

They can inspire people to do great things or maintain a system of personal gain, self-aggrandisement and bullying. We only have to look around our to see much of the latter and little of the former.

A good leader or a good boss is a rare animal these days even accepting nobody is perfect. Too many careerists looking out for number one instead of concentrating on the job at hand and getting the best out of staff just by treating people with respect. It is not that difficult.

I am glad for a bit of PC in regards to some work behaviours. Who would wish to go back to the good old days of sexually aggressive managers and all that entailed. At least one can go about their jobs for the most part without worrying about some cretin with a hand up one's dress.

Bullying may be overstated but this does not mean the baby should be thrown out with the bath water (excuse the cliche). A good manager does not resort to bullying however a bad employee should also be accountable for their own failures. I know of one case where a manager had to endure an accusation of bullying for giving a poor performance review. After more than one investigation the manager was exonerated. A victim of a false claim of bullying is as equally traumatised as a legitimate victim of bullying.