Or one green and one blue...

Attempting to divert from the serious questions I raise with flippancy, doesn't change the fact that at least one gay lobbyist thinks it appropriate that very young children be indoctrinated/ educated with SS propaganda.

My question is how many gays etc think this appropriate because even one is too many, particularly if we are thinking of providing Same Sex couples with children for nurturing purposes.

Is the motivation nurturing or indoctrination?.

If one does not believe in the existence of a gay gene, and I do not, then it becomes possible Same Sex preference is a learnt or taught behaviour.

In the total absence of proof that homosexuality or lesbianism is a genetic trait (despite numerous interest groups attempting to prove the existence of such a gene) I cannot and will not compare same sex preference to being born with multi color eyes.

May I also remind posters that it is for the welfare of children that I feel the need to seek reassurance that my community would not support introducing sexual politics into pre-school education.

I also repeat that I believe doing so would only serve the purposes of the gay and lesbian community and be of no benefit to the children.

Dear Thinker,
Perhaps you didn't know that if a Mother has, say, 3 male babies, the genes will automatically, in some cases, help the body of the mother manufacture a girl rather than a boy. However, having said that, sometimes not enough genes are manufactured in the body, and another Male is born, lacking enough in male genes that the end result is a male in a female body., that is one way, the genes behave, google 'what makes homosexuals',or how does homosexuality occur, and you will/might be surprised by what you read.
Often it is the Mother, desperately wanting a girl, who sexualises the male, towards the female trend/behaviour.
There are also the 'younger' kids, who 'adopt' homosexuality, just to rebel and shock their parents. Sometimes Nature is stronger and fickle beyond our comprehension, we shouldn't judge these people....as for Bert and Ernie, like most people say, they are just puppets.
NSB

Dear Thinker
What I did want to emphasise in my post was that no matter what sexual persuasion people indulge in, it is none of any body else's business, it is a private matter to those concerned, after all, as mere humans'
who are we to judge others.
I think the next generation(s) will not be too fussed about same sex marriages, most of todays generation are only absorbed with their own needs and wants. But as my best friend says "I don't care if people do rude things to owls at night, as long as they leave me alone", live and let live is what my philosophy is.
Have a good evening,
Cheers, NSB

Dear Thinker 2,

I'm sorry that you think people have been
trivialising your thread. I think that most
people have found the entire matter just to
bizarre - and haven't taken it seriously
as a result.

I don't think any one would
seriously consider presenting sexual inclinations
as a suitable subject for tiny tots or pre-schoolers.
That would fall under the heading of inappropriate or
just plain stupefying

I share a view with your friend NSB, but I would go a little bit further and say that I am not really concerned if people want to have sex with consenting bullfrogs and long as I (or my family) don't have to watch that on television.

I also agree that such matters are of of a private and also adult nature. Your reasoning about mothers, sounds like a plausible evolutionary theory NSB. I agree that this is possible.

I suppose I was really trying to draw attention to the fact that childhood can be a wonderful thing without complicated concepts like questioning your sexuality.

If we were to consider other forms of media, like Rockstars etc and other forms of influences during prime time media, even ads, (on display for the young too absorb), we see an over representation if you like, of images and behaviour of a sexual nature.

If one was too argue that this media barrage doesn't effect the viewpoint of children, and even introduce problems of self image as a result, then I would think it would be easy to prove a case to the contrary.

I see plenty of evidence of indoctrination, but little or no evidence at all of a connection between sexual preference and genetic disposition in the case of same sex relationships. As for the exploitation of children now occurring in the media by all kinds of interested commercial stakeholders, I think this a further disgrace.

I hope I have not put my views too strongly NSB , but I do think it's important.