The Forum > General Discussion > Finally someome making sence on the mining tax
Finally someome making sence on the mining tax
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Income tax is based upon personal earnings, corporation tax is based on earnings before tax (EBT), GST is a consumption tax collected by the states but distributed by the federal government, the proposed mining tax is a tax on only mining companies as an additional tax on yet to be defined extra profits, royalties are levied by states for their state owned mineral rights and a CO2 tax on emitters and miners is “money in circulation” rather like Euro funding.
The CO2 tax is the most difficult to deal with because once collected it is distributed on the “dispensation of favors” basis, in theory everyone benefits by being able to make a case for a bit of the action. The public are unlikely to ever know if the amount spent is equal to, less than or greater than the sum collected. This is one of the prime causes of Euro-money contamination.
Each form of revenue raising affects the ability of the other taxes to raise revenue. State royalties reduce corporation EBT and therefore reduce the taxable amount of corporation and mining tax.
Therefore, for our federal government to incrementally and arbitrarily introduce new taxes before the September tax summit or a redistribution of GST is economic lunacy.
It has to be noted that whilst others are talking about mining royalties, Lara Giddings has already increased it in Tasmania, smart lady