The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > AGW Denies Natural Justice?

AGW Denies Natural Justice?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All
Correction: "remains they’re not connected and there’s escalation"
Should read: remains they’re not connected and there’s NO escalation
Posted by SPQR, Sunday, 13 March 2011 8:20:53 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Take away the military & excess pleasure industry & you will have a carbon footprint so small you wouldn't know it was there.
Posted by individual, Sunday, 13 March 2011 8:49:46 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
its interesting watching the chickens come home to roost

Quote of the day
Tags:CLIMATEGATE
I have worked in government for 28 years as an economist,
and for the last 20 years I have worked on environmental programs.

In that time I have not seen a shred of evidence to justify global warming,let alone man made global warming and I have not seen a shred of evidence that there is going to be a green economic boom.

The only evidence I have seen is that there is a green economic bust, that money invested in green technologies is usually wasted and simply consumes investment that could be better used elsewhere.

I think that anybody in government or industry who can not understand this is either dishonest, stupid, or both.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/#ixzz1GVpYWfKk

Risk of Nuclear Catastrophe Escalates in Japan
‘Worse than Chernobyl’

The Institute for Public Accuracy issued the following statement by nuclear expert, Kevin Kamp, about the risk of nuclear disaster in post-Earthquake Japan: “The electrical grid is down.

The emergency diesel generators have been damaged. The multi-reactor Fukushima atomic power plant is now relying on battery power, which will only last around eight hours.

The danger is, the very thermally hot reactor cores at the plant must be continuously cooled for 24 to 48 hours. Without any electricity, the pumps won’t be able to pump water through the hot reactor cores to cool them.

Once electricity is lost,
the irradiated nuclear fuel could begin to melt down.

If the containment systems fail,
a catastrophic radioactivity release to the environment could occur.”

Webmaster's Commentary:
I have to wonder if we would be facing this crisis if the International Atomic Energy Agency had focused on inspecting the safety of the very real power stations of the world instead of wasting all their time and resources trying to find the fantasy nuclear weapons of Iraq and Iran...

go greens
run away

what use tempery polititions
pushing their temperary solutions..for their two faced two party pay masters..

feeding the people spin..
playing the man not the ball

greening the world
till the world did fall
Posted by one under god, Monday, 14 March 2011 6:21:01 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
At Crippled Japanese Nuclear Plant:
'Last-Ditch Effort' To Prevent Meltdown

On Weekend Edition, Jon told host Linda Wertheimer that the plan to flood the core with seawater and boric acid may be unprecedented and will effectively destroy the power plant.

If the plan fails and the core does meltdown, Jon said the only thing left to do will be to "seal it up with concrete.

You sort of entomb it."

Japan hits panic button:
using sea water to try to cool down reactor!

Japanese officials continued their battle to control dangerous reactor overheating in the nation's worst nuclear accident that followed Friday's earthquake, as they resorted to an unprecedented attempt to cool the reactor with seawater.

Webmaster's Commentary:
Using Seawater will destroy the reactor. Taking this step means they have given up all hope of recovering and repairing the reactor.

Now they are just trying to shut it down by any means necessary.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/#ixzz1GVnm1me5

Thorium Reactors cannot melt down,
and cannot be used to make bombs!

Webmaster's Commentary:
For the $14 trillion that the Wall Street MBS Fraud cost America, we could have built 130 Thorium reactors, which do not melt down and which do not produce bombs.

Read more: WHAT REALLY HAPPENED
The History The US Government HOPES You Never Learn! http://whatreallyhappened.com/#ixzz1GVqL3etm
Posted by one under god, Monday, 14 March 2011 6:23:54 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
dont say you wernt told
in the future there will be a whole range
of new futures to trade with...

the first shall be carbon credits
then when that dont work
they will tax methane

when that fails they will tax nitrous oxide
[from farming..ie the nitrogen farmers use]
of which fully one third goes into nitrouse oxide]

these will all be future commodities govt will find ways to tax in
and moneytraders will find ways to trade in..its a rather neat sceme

we are all co2 emmiters
its in our breath
in our bread
in softdrink
in puff pastry
in airated chocolate

its in vegies
in meat
its the base of all life
yet govt says its a poisen...tax it
and the money men say lets tade in permits to polute

it can only go from bad
to worse

thus agw..
the lie
deneies natural justice
cause those paying for the scam
will be..*just us
Posted by one under god, Monday, 14 March 2011 8:25:17 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
You are all still batting your gums over a problem that may end up not
being a problem at all.
The IPCC has yet to rerun its computer models against the March 2010
more realistic data for fossil fuel availability.

So why are you still discussing it ?

The argument is redundant until such times as they rerun the program.
I hope the IPCC is not trying to ignore the new data.
They wouldn't would they ?

http://aleklett.wordpress.com/2010/03/01/validity-of-the-fossil-fuel-production-outlooks-in-the-ipcc-emission-scenarios/

or

http://tinyurl.com/yhqn2pv
Posted by Bazz, Monday, 14 March 2011 12:05:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy