Stu

A few pointers :)

The legislature cannot purport to predetermine the legal outcome, or to change the direction or outcome, of a court case.

Powers of government are divided between the Commonwealth and the State governments, with certain powers being exclusive to the Commonwealth, others being concurrently exercised, and the remainder being exclusively held by the States

Your Policing and Crime policy would need a referendum to amend the constitution. Unlikely.

Your veteran's policy is biased in favour of Service personnel, (reflecting your personal circumstances). Why should these people be treated as a special case? Should not this apply to all who have sustained injury or impairment as a result of their employment?

"If a person thinks that injury is of no concern then so be it, thus this person or persons are responsible for their actions."

Sorry this is crud. People, corporations and governments have a duty of care.

Sorry to hijack the topic but Stu needs to sort out his conflicting policies (And I am trying to help him) :)

May I suggest http://www.leukaemia.org.au/web/index.php as a good place for your membership fees :)

Re policing and crime nothing wrong with that unless you are the one commiting the crime
unconstitutional no
the right thing and what the public keep saying needs to be done, i for one being one of those public.

As for veterans bias no respect yes.
Remember it was labor that screwed the compensation with the compensation and rehabilitation service, what to save money.

It seems steve must be close up someones backside in pollie land, i didnt recall allowing these pollies to have free flights,drivers,cares free fuel and offices after they got kicked out, how about we change their super to what is 62.

Our diggers volunteer to protect Australia maybe we should dismantle this and you should look after your own yard instead

Willing to take up arms or just pathetic as an excuse.
I remember being their for the newcastle earthquake, the floods in warren and the bushfires in the blue mountains,lithgow,bell area and the worst thing about that was the mess we had to fix due to incompetent state and local goverment.

So no probs here oh and by the way you must have mist how Mr Sartor in NSW is being a dictator all over the front page of the telegraph so one would say clean up you own corrupt and branch stacked back yard before complaining about anyone elses.

Also facts
state part of constitution or is this just ravings of a looney

Stu.

I have tried to point out some inconsistencies in your policies, some contradict each other.

Given that in the last Federal election 91.2% of the people voted for the major parties:
Liberal 40.5%
Labor 37.6%
Greens 7.2%
Nats 5.9%

and this has been consistent over most elections, you have about 8% to play with.

House of reps? Forget it. Senate even harder.

Try standing as an independant for your local council, no won't work your policies aren't local.

In other words I am getting a bit tired of your posts on OLO, promoting your fallacious party (4 members on your PHP forum is not a good advertisement).

Sorry everyone else, back to climate change. (Seeing Stu has no policy on this subject). :)

If the people dont have choice and how they get their prefrences
no wonder you dont account for anything.

Oh by the way i am not the one in government those is government, oh have you seen their policies or they just a fairytale.

Maybe our government will just keep acting in a corrupt and unconstitutional way towards the people.

THAT RIGHT UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THAT WOULD MAKE IT UNLAWFUL

WOULDNT THAT MEAN THEY SHOULD BE SACKED, THEIR PARTIES DEREGISTERED AND NO ONLY THE MAJORS BUT ALL IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

YOU ALL SHOULD UNDERSTAND UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BELIEVES IT CAN DO AS IT PLEASES

Steve for nutting this out go to www.tapp.org.au and go to forum tell me how you would change it

stu