The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Consent, condoms, conspiracy.

Consent, condoms, conspiracy.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. All
I have a mate that can put one on his head and blow it up......and guess what he turned into...........but back to the topic.....:) Poor Julian Assange......Who sold him those condoms..........yeah! Thats the real conspiracy.

Another great Australian hero.

Any more knifes out there?

BLUE
Posted by Deep-Blue, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 9:29:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
My understanding is that men are often prepared to pay prostitutes considerably more to have unprotected sex with them.

From what I can gather the first woman with whom Assange is said to have intercourse when the condom broke had a suspicion that the condom was tampered with in some way by Assange.

I find it perfectly conceivable that after learning about the alleged "surprise" sex that the second woman experienced that the two of them have considered that Assange may well be a serial offender in attempting unprotected sex.

As is often the case women who may have been reluctant to report their own experience are more prepared to do so if they learn others have been affected. Two reasons could be assumed, one they feel they are more likely to be believed and secondly they think they may be able to stop others experiencing the attentions of the offender.

Hopefully the courts can decide if this is the case here. It may well instead be a case of vindictiveness but to judge it as such now would be a little unfair. Even if it were found to be so I don't think that should disqualify us from considering those laws for our own country.
Posted by csteele, Thursday, 23 December 2010 12:03:05 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Look.........! The reasons why we are all here in the first place.......is because some forked female said the snake was cool............and now its still our fault:)

Funny how religious people fall over their own ass-p:)

BLUE
Posted by Deep-Blue, Thursday, 23 December 2010 1:03:11 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Csteele:”I find it perfectly conceivable that after learning about the alleged "surprise" sex that the second woman experienced that the two of them have considered that Assange may well be a serial offender in attempting unprotected sex.”

Attempting unprotected sex is a crime somewhere? Is marriage some kind of amnesty? It is crazy.

In the gay threads the problem with anal health stuff is mentioned a lot so given it seems to be a health hazard is anal sex outlawed in Sweden for their own good?

Neither woman said no, one kept him around for a week. According to my source (google) they only went to the police originally to see if they could make him go take an STD test – super stupid given if they were worried THEY need testing not him. So the govt decided there had been a crime later on… personally I don’t want govt telling me I am a victim of anything while taking charge and seeking some kind of sneaky revenge against some bloke.

And Deep Blue? You’re a shocka mate. : )
Posted by Jewely, Thursday, 23 December 2010 7:07:49 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
csteele, "I find it perfectly conceivable that after learning about the alleged "surprise" sex that the second woman experienced that the two of them have considered that Assange may well be a serial offender in attempting unprotected sex.

As is often the case women who may have been reluctant to report their own experience are more prepared to do so if they learn others have been affected."

That is just speculative gossip and stereotyping - repeat it enough and to the easily persuaded it becomes 'fact'. You would have to be partisan to bend over so far backwards to find excuses for one side while denying the accused similar leeway.

Besides, it is hardly empowering for women to be regarded as such silly, timid, ineffectual, simpering little 'girls' that they need to go to the powder room together to lend one other support. The right word is collusion and it is nasty.
Posted by Cornflower, Thursday, 23 December 2010 11:36:32 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
[Deleted. Trying to argue a moderation decision.]
Posted by nairbe, Thursday, 23 December 2010 8:11:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy