The Forum > General Discussion > Just how independent are the independents?.
Just how independent are the independents?.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Perhaps I am just a pedantic fool but why do you left-wing socialist have to hide your real identities? Are you ashamed of your opinions? Are you frightened of making a fool of yourselves?
As I understand it, we have five independents, Tony Windsor, Oakeshott (NSW), Katter (Qld), and one from WA who took Wilson Tuckey's seat and now Wilkie from Tasmania. All of them have backgrounds in the National Party. The seats they represent are notionally conservative and rural, yet each player has had a falling out with the National/Country Party in the past, and continue fighting it out in the present.
Each individual has won, or hopes to win, special treatment for their electorates by virtue of being independents, and have/will be successful. But, if they collectively band together and return the Rudd/Gillard Govt., the worst Fed Govt. in living memory, their conservative electorates will almost certainly dump them at the first opportunity.
The dilemma is how will Abbott win them back to the consrvative side of politics and allow them to save face at the same time.
Geoffrey Kelley