The Forum > General Discussion > The ethics of remote warfare
The ethics of remote warfare
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
<< The pilots in the video act "like they are playing a computer game and their desire is they want to get high scores" by killing opponents >>
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/04/06/2864956.htm
If that's what happens when the pilots are actually there, how much more likely is it for them to get it so wrong when the targets are just images on a video screen?
Oh well, the Baghdad massacre was found by the US military to be "justified" under their rules of engagement, as will massacres by remotely-controlled drones undoubtedly be. Just collateral damage I guess, but it's hardly going to win over 'hearts and minds', is it?