The Forum > General Discussion > Hurt Locker vs Avatar - judged purely on merits?
Hurt Locker vs Avatar - judged purely on merits?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I loved Avatar - purely for the visuals.
The 3-D effect wasn't perfect - a bit
blurry at times - however - the colour
was fantastic. The story line had quite
a few inconsistencies - but as I said -
it was the visuals that made up for it.
I found it thoroughly entertaining.
I haven't seen Hurt Locker yet so I can't
judge. However, my vote would still go to
Avatar - purely for the innovation.
One question with the Oscars - perhaps
a film that strikes a cord with the voters,
and has the capacity to move them - will gather
more votes than a film that has brilliant
innovative techniques - but is a bit thin on
the story line. Look at "Precious," and
"Crazy Heart," and "The Blind Side," all highly
emotive films - and I imagine "Hurt Locker" is
along the same lines although as I said I haven't
seen it yet... but I do think that the topic
would definitely strike a cord with many voters
as it deals with - soldiers, Iraq, and the addictive
nature of war.