RobP
Excellent observations.

Yes, that's true Rob. One could even argue that science doesn't matter anymore - politicians, economists and religious zealots will determine government policy in response to climate change. In that, yes there will be much debate - however it will be a 'debate' that scientists will be loathe to enter, for obvious reasons. Unfortunately, you will get the likes of Lord Christopher Monckton, Third Viscount of Brenchley (similarly global warming 'alarmists') distorting and misrepresenting the science to drive a political agenda.

The ABC is about dogma more than most religous people. They have shown this consistently with their fervour to support the earth worshiping movement which spread the false and now debunk dogma of man made climate change. The current affair shows are stacked with their favourite High Priests and they rarely have balance. Red Kerry finds it impossible to be balanced and Jones is nothing short of disgraceful.

The ABC is about dogma more than most religous people. They have shown this consistently with their fervour to support the earth worshiping movement which spread the false and now debunk dogma of man made climate change. To think that they even had the hide to declare 'the science is settled.' Any true scientist must be extremely frustrated by the spin needed to keep the funding coming. The current affair shows are stacked with their favourite High Priests and they rarely have balance. Red Kerry finds it impossible to be balanced and Jones is nothing short of disgraceful in his bias.

qanda,

The way I see it, if you have the Al Gores of this world you must have the Christopher Moncktons. And, conversely, if you have the Moncktons, you must have the Gores. Now that's the parity sorted out.

Despite the one-sidedness of these two, there's still a limit to how far they can go before they will come a-cropper, I suspect. Don't forget there's a third force - the apathetic centre - that's got the measure of these two.

My group Architect and Engineers for 911 truth have been protesting out side the ABC for 2 yrs.The ABC refuse to confront the new evidnece of 911.They even tell their staff not to take our literature.

All the ABC has to do is air the evidence and debunk it,if it is wrong.
WTC building 7 did it for me.2 yrs ago I never knew it existed.It took the Bush Admin 6 yrs to release a report that was a farce.There were 3 buildings that came down that day which few know about.

We have a 186m building coming down in 6.5 sec.It reached a max speed of 205kph and accelerated absolute freefall for 2.5 sec in a vacuum.Why was there not resistance to gravity in a building which no plane crashed into and had only a few minor fires of no real consequence?

see http://www.aetruth.org/