It's just a piece of paper held by a bunch of guys with a bigger stick than you. If you try to articulate the restrictions placed upon them by the words on that paper, they'll just pull out their guns, the same guns they took off you all those years ago and let you know who owns the words.

You can't beat the establishment with their own words and slowly, slowly, like a cancer, they'll progressively oppress you more and more. Land owners are just starting to find this out.

There are many websites and groups actively discussing these very issues everyday and have been for eons, hell we do it on this one all the time. I'm getting a bit tired really of the circulatory discussion around this topic; it's just another GHG adding to the warming. It's about time someone led the way to discussing how we might go about changing the status quo so that we the people end up holding the biggest stick again?

Constitution is social contract between government and citizens. Constitution provides with the minimum rights one can expect in this particular country. However it seems there is no relief (or so) provided for breach of the citizens’ rights "given" by the constitution which makes the rights more theoretical then practical.

It is surprising that more people don't utilise the Consitution in legal cases against the Government."
.........
The above is because not every court has power to decide on the constitutional matter. When someone goes to the court that starts in the inferior court (& lower costs) and then one can appeal to the court of higher jurisdiction. With constitutional matter person has usually to go directly to the court of higher jurisdiction (& higher costs). Obviously, the person prefers to resolve his own problems but not theoretical issues about the Constitution. Also what remedy person can have if he or she is not given all the rights promised by Constitution? Whereas fighting his or her rights under other law person might be entitled to monetary damages or so

According to the Constitution we all have legal rights and protection In watching the DVD the VOICE OF AUSTRLIA which runs for approximately 36 minutes made me aware of a number of illegal practices in the Magistrate Infringment Court System. I discovered that An Order by a Single Judge or Magistrate is not a Judiciary Order
It is illegal because it is a violation of common law in the Criminal Code Act 1995 Section26A10. In Victoria at the present time Robyn White the Sheriff, in conjunction with the Melbourne Magistrates Infringement Court and Civic Compliance are running a campaign via the media to get people to pay all outstanding infringement penalties.
Failure to pay before the 19th of March 2010 will incur the following,
your vehicle will be clamped, drivers license counciled, and property seized. Again this is illegal under the Criminal Code ACT Section 26A10 In fact under the Criminal Code ACT it would be deemed to be demanding money with menaces.
The Constitution is clear in its Statute Acts concerning Courts.
It states any person charged with an offence cannot be convicted by a judge alone because a single person is biased that is why we have a jury system. Any Penalty by a Judge alone is invalid and illegal.
on December 5th 2006 all 7 High Court Judges the highest court in the land stated unamously that the AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION REIGNS SUPREME and that all other rules and laws are subject to the Australian Constitution so if any laws conflict with the Constitution they are invalid and illegal.
Unfortunately we the people of Australia have done nothing to stop the misuse of illegal practices by governments, courts, councils or any other individuals who tamper with OUR CONSTITUTION, this could be due to not knowing of or understanding the Constition.
If anyone would like a copy of the DVD let me know and I will endeavour to send you a copy. Its very informative and easy to understand

Its hot and wet in Melbourne tonight. The Constitution is a wonderful document when it is understood exactly what it is. It is a compact between all denominations in Australia to ensure the Rule of Law applies to everyone without fear or favor. The ultimate Sovereign under Our Constitution is Almighty God and when we voted for it, or all the men voted for it in 1899 they were Anglican, other protestant and Roman Catholic, we confirmed that. Women did not vote in 1899.

It in fact establishes the form of government adopted from the Holy Bible by the English Catholics in 1297. Almighty God has as His delegate under the Constitution a modified Queen, modified by S 116 Constitution to be an inclusive God, and not an exclusive God, who even though slavery was abolished in 1810, continued to make Irish and Scottish slaves out of Roman Catholics by the convict system. The Australian Constitution is the abolition of that concept, but as you will realize, another form of slavery has been introduced by Atheists, called debt slavery.

You see Christians were forbidden to lend money at interest. Only Jews and Atheists could do that. Muslims are prohibited too, so they invest expecting a return. Equity is an essential element of Christianity. Law is law. Equity is justice. The Saviour of Australia will probably be the State of Victoria. It has some unwilling heroes, but the Magistrates Court in Victoria has been given enormous powers and currently does 95% of all legal work in Victoria. It is currently nobbled, by some illegal State legislation, illegal because it contradicts directly valid and effective federal Acts.

A wedge is being driven into the heart of the Atheist –Jewish Cartel, that has dominated Australian Law since 1970. This is because the Trade Practices Act 1974 is a real law, prohibits exclusive dealing, and cartel conduct. Despite KR and his sucking up to the States, his Government has introduced useful legislation. It will promote competition and set most Australians free of the oppression by the States as they rob and pillage to survive

Kevin was elected because he said he would govern under the Constitution. We believed him, because Howard was not doing so. What remains to be seen is whether Abbott wants the Lodge badly enough, to promise to do so and keep his promise. The pressure to ignore the Constitution is enormous, and Rudd has succumbed to the lobbyists who represents his State Mates, and failed to deliver on that core promise.

Section 79 Constitution states : the federal jurisdiction of any court shall be exercised by such number of judges as Parliament prescribes. My English says court is not Court, and judges is not Judge. Every court must exercise federal jurisdiction when an Australian is in the dock. We're not dual citizens in our own country.

In the High Court in 1915, the Crimes Act 1914 was confirmed as law, and it contains the guarantee that the Judicial Power of the Commonwealth will maintain its integrity in S 43. The penalty for a breach of S 43 is $33,000 a day for an individual and $165,000 a day for a corporation, and that penalty is what is being considered by lawyers in Victoria. Except for a few high flyers, most young barristers in Victoria are starving. They have worked hard to get a law degree, and most cannot get a mortgage, because the legal cartel restricts them by Victorian Law to being the slave of solicitors, and only the favoured few get the nod and prosper.

It is cartelized from Magistrate to High Court Judge, and they sell law. The poorer lawyers are now prepared to work outside the box, and hopefully share in the deep seam of wealth that the Penal action represents. If a Statute was broken, until 1970 in New South Wales anyone could sue for damages for breach. In Victoria they still can, and the law of the Commonwealth exercised by a Victorian Magistrate, covers the continent. If Kevin wants to retain the Lodge, he should put a Federal Policeman in every court, to ensure that only judges rule, and we get courts instead of Courts