The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Petty Symbolism Portrays a War Within

Petty Symbolism Portrays a War Within

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All
Poor Mr Hunt. Wouldn't you be tempted to change your name legally rather than live with constant ridicule?

It would be interesting to know the origin of some names like my old high school teachers Mr Longbottom and Mrs Lillecrappe.

Perhaps Longbottom derived from a long line of tailoring families or Lillecrappe...no on that one I'm lost.

Mind you I was once tempted to name my girls botanically, choices being - Rose, Sage, Lily, or Willow.
Posted by pelican, Saturday, 27 February 2010 8:09:23 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
That's what impressed me so much about him, Pelican.

>>Poor Mr Hunt. Wouldn't you be tempted to change your name legally rather than live with constant ridicule?<<

By meeting the challenge head-on, he made it other people's problem, rather than his own. And in doing so, made ridicule impossible.

The (unspoken, I have to say) subtext was "Hey, it's my name. Deal with it".
Posted by Pericles, Sunday, 28 February 2010 4:02:04 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Posted by Severin, Friday, 26 February 2010 2:13:42 PM:



"She wouldn't hear of keeping her own surname
and eventually she did become Mrs Robyn Hood."



Evidently she was of the Marion kind, after all.

Did people start referring to her in Freudian slips as Marion, after her marriage, Severin? Just curious. And apologies for unintentionally decapitalising your new userID on david f's topic yesterday.
Posted by Forrest Gumpp, Sunday, 28 February 2010 4:30:07 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It all comes down to moving with the times. Many members of earlier generations of women may have felt the need to make a symbolic gesture, that reminded people that they weren't their husband's property. In 2010, attitudes towards marrage have changed sufficiently to make this symbolic gesture look petty.
Posted by benk, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 3:21:24 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
'In 2010, attitudes towards marrage have changed sufficiently to make this symbolic gesture look petty.'

Hmmm, could that be expanded to encapsulate much much more feminist doctrine. I think you better have a word to pynchme.
Posted by Houellebecq, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 3:36:12 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Houllie

Would having an argument with Pynchme over this issue be petty? I doubt that Pynchme would get too fired up, that would be more SJF's style. Think twice before posting in praise of pettiness, that would be a predictable Houllie response.
Posted by benk, Wednesday, 3 March 2010 7:28:59 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy