The Forum > General Discussion > Fire sale of deathtrap houses?
Fire sale of deathtrap houses?
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
If a brave inspector is found, who should pay for the inspection?
These installations were subsidised by government and the house owners had no say in the qualifications of the installers.
If the beneficiaries of faulty installations are in fear of a fire breaking out do they have to declare this to their house insurance agent? Do they have to infom the real estate agent if they decide to sell the house?
From now on, it's not only asbestos we worry about. How do purchasers ensure a house is not a death-trap?
I believe vendors would be responsible for any damage and/or loss of life to subsequent residents if they sold their house without fixing hazards. Archicentre will confirm that this has occurred with dodgy balconies or extensions, or illegal wiring, i.e., carried out by unqualified persons.
Speaking of unqualified -- how much food-poisoning has occurred with the employing of unqualified graduates of shonky cooking colleges set up purely to gain immigration visas? I hope for the sake of people being attended to by similarly poorly trained hairdressers/barbers that the cut-throat razor has been superseded.
But why pillory the politicians? Garrett is just another pawn in the great Australian greed game. The sin is our general acceptance that we are, as perceived overseas, a nation of jumbuck-grabbing swagmen. (I would say swagpersons but that may not be factually correct, even if politically so.)