The Forum > General Discussion > Does Gender Influence Debate on OLO?
Does Gender Influence Debate on OLO?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I'd like you to read in its entirety the
following website:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/features/four_corners/
It explains how the business of government was
being done under Mr Kennett.
I'll list just a few of the items discussed for you here:
1) Lack of transparency in processes.
2) Contracts let without tender.
3) Deals done in secret under the shield of
commercial confidentiality.
4) Laws changed to deny the public's right to know.
5)The fate of Victorian Auditor-General became
a rallying-cry for those concerned about the
Government's style of doing business. A plan
supported by the Premier to allow Departments to
appoint their own auditors - was widely seen as an
attack on the Auditor-General's power to review
Government decisions.
6) Part of a systematic campaign was to stem the
powers of the Director of Public Prosecutions, The
Equal Opportunity Commission and Local Councils.
7) Two hundred or more Acts of Parliament went
through which exluded the jurisdiction of the
Supreme Court to review the actions of Government...
And there's more, much more - but read it for
yourself. Describing the guy as having "Balls"
is not quite how most Victorians would describe him!
Most of us agree that without proper controls -
things get out of control (corruption - jobs for
the boys - et cetera.) It's important to maintain
a system of checks and balances.
As for the Library Staff - we not only offered to
take cuts in salary - we offered to job-share -
to save jobs! But when you cut three jobs - to
appoint a CEO - who is consistently on "leave"
at a salary that three librarians could have
been appointed on - I'm sorry Yabster - you had
to be there to really appreciate how pathetic it
all really was!
Anyway - I don't want to discuss it with you any
further except to politely say - we'll have
to agree to disagree on this one.