The Forum > General Discussion > Useless Guinness Records
Useless Guinness Records
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
It's not really beyond comprehension to me. Teams want to win. In order to win, they want their players to be fit. Consequently, they conduct fitness camps. I'm pretty sure that teams wanted their players to win even when cricket was an amateur sport. Fitness camps may not have been so popular, of course, because the players had to do their day jobs before heading off to play cricket. Yes, there is big money in cricket, but that hasn't always been so; the desire to win, however, has always been there.
Records have been kept for as long as sport has been organised. They are a matter of pride and, perhaps, were even more important before big money came into play. In the time when Olympians were amateurs, all they took home from the Games would be a medal and the pride of saying they were the best in the world. Suggesting that sporting records are an aberration suggests that their efforts are not worthwhile. Certainly running or swimming 100m really fast isn't going to feed the poor, but it boosts morale and pride. I have a friend (well, more of a casual acquaintance) who has held several swimming world records. Has this improved my life? No. But when I see her on the starting blocks, my chest swells with pride, as do the chests of many Australians who don't even know her. What harm is done by recording her achievements?
As for the commodification of records, let's keep in mind:
a) in most cases, records can't be bought or sold. They have to be achieved.
b) the Guinness Book of Records doesn't own, buy or sell records. It simply puts them in a book and sells that book. The same information can be found in several other places, usually free of charge.