The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > The Storm that raged

The Storm that raged

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
It is my understanding that ASIC have audited the practices of SF and that they have found no wrong doing as far as complying with ASIC's requirements.

Furthermore, it is my understanding that financial planners have been hit with many new laws and regulations over the past decade or so, so I am not sure what you are trying to point out other than you didn't like the howard government.
Posted by rehctub, Sunday, 14 June 2009 9:08:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The Keating Government was getting ready to totally reform and restore the system of government we used to have in Australia before the Liberal Party decided we could go one better. It amended the Trade Practices Act 1974 with the Competition Policy Reform Act 1995, and extended its provisions to both Local Government and State businesses, but the Liberals suppressed it by the simple expedient of failing to allocate resources to it, and limiting the application of regulations, to whatever the minister in charge said the regulations applied to.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was just one of the acts enacted by Labor that was never applied, and there are a whole raft of others. The Evidence Act 1995, (Cth) declares that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is to be used to exclude improperly obtained evidence, in S 138 (3) (f), The Criminal Code Act 1995 ( Cth) declares the Covenent means the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and that was actually not proclaimed as a Schedule until 20th October 2001, but has never been enforced.

What I am saying is that the Government, by reference to s 56, of the Judiciary Act 1903, has made itself since 1903, liable in Tort, for any wrong that its actions have brought about. However to avoid having to answer to the courts, the Liberals in 2006, inserted a S31A which gave the Federal Court power with one Judge, to make a summary judgment, effectively turning the court into what was commonly known as a Star Chamber, or Capital C Court, with power to grant favors to the ruling government.

The great bulwark against arbitrary power, established in England in 1297, was the democtratic institution comprised of 12 electors, drawn from those who could vote. The Habeas Corpus Act 1640 16 Charles 1 Ch X reinforced that safeguard, and the Covenant does also. In fact summary judgments brought down without a jury trial were declared void, in 1640, and were likewise void, until 1966, when the Liberals introduced them in Bankruptcy matters
Posted by Peter the Believer, Monday, 15 June 2009 5:14:06 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The Rudd Government has to bite the bullet and either accept that the last Labor Government reformed the system of government in Australia, and the Liberal Party was the counter revolution, that stopped the reform process in its tracks, or continue as a Liberal Government in fact if not name. When Australia nearly went broke after the last recession, the Keating government put in place reforms that should have stopped the worst excesses of the big lenders, the likes of SF, and the plethora of mini lenders, who took advantage of the loose lending practices enacted in the United States.

It may be that the Liberals just lost power in time, because this Storm was on its way, even as they were defeated. It was going to overwhelm whatever government was in power. Its effects are still working their way through the system. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights effectively abolishes the independence of the States. If the Rudd Government will accept it is in fact law. S 58 Judiciary Act 1903 allows suits against a State in federal jurisdiction. The fiction that we can be members of two States simultaneously, is maintained by the abolition of jury trials as of right.

When I wore a khaki uniform, way back, before Vietnam, Australia was still one country. It had universal jury trial in all matters, and we were members of a Commonwealth. In 1966, in a follow up of the destruction of the High Court in 1953, after Menzies cracked a hissy fit against them, because they refused to let him ban the Communist Party, the Liberals destroyed the Bankruptcy court as a check on excesses by corporations. Huge numbers of people with good viable businesses were asset stripped, by the big bankers, manipulating the Courts. It is still going on today.

KR is a church attending Christian. He has a good scattering of lawyers in his government. Lawyers are intrinsically dishonest, as I found when studying law, at three different tertiary institutions. The dean of one said the law is all about money and power
Posted by Peter the Believer, Monday, 15 June 2009 5:34:36 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
As a movie I enjoyed the Perfect Storm. It was saddening to see such courageous men perish, but we all go sooner or later. There used to be a saying it is an ill wind that blows nobody some good. This perfect financial storm, has the potential to blow an enormous amount of good into Australia as a Commonwealth, and unite us as never before.

Because KR is a Christian, we have a chance. For 669 years, from 1297 until 1966, both England and Australia were ruled by the principles of the New Testament. The prophesy made in Isaiah 9 verse 6, that the government would be on His shoulders, was enacted as law. The King James Version Bible I have has a black star against the passages that were adopted as prophetic, by the rebel English, starting with Genesis 49 verse 10. That was where Jacob, the heel grabber, whose name was changed to Israel, man of God, vested power in his son Judah. The scepter ( of power) shall not depart from Judah, until Shiloh come. The English understood this to mean that power was vested in Jesus Christ and his teachings were adopted by them.

If you are in Sydney, in the old Courthouses, there is a Royal Seal, set behind the throne, where the presiding Justice used to sit, and on top of the Royal Seal, is the Lion of Judah. It also sits sculpted in stone, in the front of the old Post Office at Central, on the Court of Petty Sessions, and the King Street Courts in the city.

The words Commonwealth of Israel, appear in Ephesians 2 verse 12, and we did not adopt the word Commonwealth by chance. Israel means man of God, so the Commonwealth was a federation of men of God. Until 1953, any man of god, could freely worship, in the Federal Supreme Court. ( s 71 Constitution). Gradually the lawyers have decided they were the new Men of God, and they knew better that the combined wisdom of 669 years. Federal Labor gave us back our religious freedom
Posted by Peter the Believer, Monday, 15 June 2009 6:01:19 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
the other storm raging

Federal-Reserve..boss..Ben Bernanke..needs to..“borrow up to $3.25 trillion in the fiscal/year ending Sept.30..[″ (Bloomberg)..without triggering a run on the dollar.

But,..how?..If the stock market keeps surging,investors will turn their backs on low-yielding US Treasuries and move into riskier securities hoping for better returns...The only way to attract more buyers to US/debt..is by raising interest-rates..which will kill the“green shoots”..of recovery..and make it harder for people to buy homes and cars...It’s a conundrum.

In the next year,..China will buy roughly $200 billion T-Bills while the oil-producing states and the rest of the world will add about $300 billion to their cache...That leaves more than $2 trillion for the domestic market..where cash-strapped investors are likely to avoid government debt/like the plague.

So,who’s going buy that mountain of low-yield government paper?

The banks....The Fed has been helping the banks raise reserves for the last year...In fact,excess bank/reserves have skyrocketed from $96.5 billion..in August 2008 to $949.6 billion..by April 2009.

Nearly a trillion bucks..in less than a year...But,..why?..Are the banks expecting to expand lending at the fastest rate in history in the middle of a depression?

Of course not...Master/illusionist..Bernanke is just arranging the props for his next big trick.

The fact is,..Bernanke anticipated the current wave of deflation and set up a straw man..(the banks)..to deal with it so it wouldn’t look like..he was simply printing more paper..to finance the deficits.

As soon as rates..[on 10 year notes..hit 4 per cent,..the banks..(that are borrowing money at 0 per cent)..will probably..start to purchase Treasuries and keep the housing and retail markets from crashing even faster....It’s called.“the old switcheroo”..and no one does it better than the Fed.

Bernanke pulled a similar stunt after Lehman Bros flopped..and he and Paulson decided that it was time to dump $700 billion worth of garbage assets on the public...The Fed chief and Treasury figured out the only way they could hoodwink congress was to foment a crisis in the credit markets..and then moan that if they didn’t get $700 billion to buy up toxic assets in the next 48 hours..“there wouldn’t be an economy by Monday”.

continued
http://www.counterpunch.org/whitney06122009.html
Posted by one under god, Monday, 15 June 2009 10:07:00 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy