The Forum > General Discussion > Childhood Onset Leukemia
Childhood Onset Leukemia
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Some fellow acting as the representative of a sub-contractor informed me verbally, and with only a few hours notice, that he intended to place an unbalanced, high capacity 11 kilovolt conductor within an unsafe distance (3 metres at closest) from our home.
Cutting to the chase and having to research the situation I came to realise that our former city council had approved and signed off situating a new electricity sub-station directly beside an existing, council built, children's playground. Much ancillary cabling encroaches on other dwellings and a nearby state school.
Now, I'm not an electrical engineer but am an engineer of 40 years experience.
I'm quite used to reading technical papers to do with most engineering and scientific disciplines.
While it is true that health risks and defecits associated with non-ionising radiation are not 'conclusively proven', according to Australian stakeholder organisations, their own 'rules of engagement' recognise that 'prudent avoidance' should be exercised at all stages of planning,installing and operating any form of emitter of such radiation.
Naturally the Australian standards are generally less stringent than just about everywhere else in the world.
The big question is more complex than that; however the core issue about two tiers of government and two firms of sub-contractors colluding towards keeping quiet about the community impact fairly indicates the future of governance in Australia.
Perhaps ours isn't the only community being denied right of comment about such project decisions.
Please send in those cards and letters.