The Forum > General Discussion > A 'cowardly attack'?
A 'cowardly attack'?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/05/israelandthepalestinians
But the argument I find most intriguing is “The Hamas terrorists are the sons, fathers, brothers etc of the victims, not a separate force, it was up to those they claim to be fighting for to deal with them.” Well they did deal with them by electing them. As a result there was a ceasefire that a cynical person might think only collapsed because and Israeli election was coming up and some chest thumping was needed.
Might not this argument lead to a justification of the bombing campaign of Israeli late night cafés? Each Israeli citizen in my understanding has had compulsory military training and these establishments were frequented mainly by those of serving age. When the bombings were occurring I remember thinking these were cowardly attacks. But if I were to adopt the above position then I might take a different view.
Back to our unmanned drones. The latest attack in Pakistan on the police academy was due to their use, "We claim responsibility for the attack. This was in retaliation to the ongoing drone attacks in the tribal areas. There will be more such attacks," Mehsud, the Pakistan Taliban leader.
These weapons have been in use for a number of years,
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article5762371.ece
Despite the Pakistani government’s resistance.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_PAKISTAN_STRIKES?SITE=AZTUC&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2009-03-18-12-18-29
Now it appears they want them for themselves.
And on it goes. I’m not sure your rocketship to the moon is going to fit them all in, but a nice thought none-the-less.