The Forum > General Discussion > Decentralisation, does anyone remember?
Decentralisation, does anyone remember?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
here is the legalities of what they did, first constitutionally the acts of the con are to control govt, [the beuro roc rats didnt like that so have adopted the rule of buisness, we the people have become serfs by a clever trick
under rules of buisness you apply [beg] for a service, so to gety a drivers licence we apply [apply means beg] we beg for a licence, this created persona[to wit a licenced driver thus falls subject to the act covering the laws of the road
well the acts of the act state punitive punishments[because you joined the group of licenced drivers [itself created under the act [you fall subject to the act]...thus not under constitutional protections ,thus whereas under real law a criminal is needed to have legal standing in court [any driver stands in court simply for violating the clubs rules ,
the court under contract juristiction dosnt need a victim only to show you are the 'licenced person'' ,thus subject to the rules of the act
[or worse YOU DIDNT DENEY it, thus the act has a presumed authority over you[as silence signifies concent]
no lawyer is going to explain it to you,[but look at the franchise to rake in cash,thus we now have the absurd state where the london law society rules the world via their lawyer members ACTUALLY MAKING THE NEO [new] revenue raising laws at whim
its unconstitutional but hey the judges were lawyers[lol]they are in on the globally centralised scam ,they wont tell you that by voting you hand over YOUR power of autorney for them to do as they chose, the dont need to tell you legally we are inmisiles[a legal term, meaning wards of the state]not capable of handeling your own affairs
and they are right