The Forum > General Discussion > What should the focus of our millitary be?
What should the focus of our millitary be?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I discussed that our biggest threat will come from the hungry and governments intent on distraction.
Who and where are we going to first strike at?
25 very, very expensive fighters going to do against a swarm of better fighters?
As for 12 subs what makes you think that they are safer look at the Brit and French subs colliding under the water. And the Collins that was hit by a ship.
One sub = how many billion. We haven’t got the sub mariners to fully crew the subs we’ve got.
Torpedo supplies 18 month delay et sec
One cruiser = billion comparatively slow.
One Destroyer One missile i.e. the Gen Belgrano
A fleet of fast frigates and patrol boats could cope with more incursions and comparatively quicker and cheaper to replace. Many more targets.
AWD tanks where? the logistics? Show me a tank that can cope our desserts/jungles/ and the Gulf country…the bulldust would clog everything the weight would bog them down, the heat well... and when in swamps good luck.
“We need bases all along our northern and western coast line.” Remember the ship load of refugees landed in the west and how many weeks before we found out? Think germ warfare, we have no defence against malicious release of animal diseases.
“Soldiers should be trained for asymmetrical warfare and how to fight in our terrain.” What good are soldiers who know how to march and fight in Pucka when where they’re required to fight is our desserts, swamps, ranges, jungles? Rapid deployment forces are required.
Why else are our commandos so valued overseas?
A full frontal attack is unlikely and if it does we will be overwhelmed by sheer numbers.
We need the best bang for our buck.
I’m arguing for making it more difficult to land unobserved and therefore more discouraging for invaders. Appropriate tools for the job, not toys for big boys.
Only a small percentage of the forces are trained for disaster and usually as a last resource.