The Forum > General Discussion > Bail them out or let them sink?
Bail them out or let them sink?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Page 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- ...
- 15
- 16
- 17
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Bronwyn, in my book, you are being rather naive about the world
and how it functions out there.
Yes, the business world is full of scoundrels. Duh. I've seen
many a public servant lose their retirement savings, when they
join the real world and the sharks move in. That is the reality
of business for you, you learn it earlier or later in life, usually
the hard way.
What it comes down to is what is legal? Either companies and agents
broke the law or they did not break the law. Politicians are the
ones who are meant to formulate laws, so that people, even the stupid,
are protected from scoundrels.
I simply do not believe that no politician knew about what was going
on and if they did know and did nothing about it, they were not doing
their job.
The reality is that business is not the Salvation Army. It works
on the basis of what is legal, not what is moral. That is the
reality, like it or not.
Those at fault are those at the top, under whose watch these schemes
took place and who had the power to change the law and did nothing.
Those who claimed to look after Joe sixpack and his vote and then
who ingnored him, once in office. Also those gullible enough to
vote for those dummies, who are now learning the hard way.
Politicians are at fault here, apart from anyone who broke the law,
who should be charged accordingly.