The Forum > General Discussion > Medicalising normalcy
Medicalising normalcy
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Unlike the 'opinion' of the contributor after you, it is important for people with personal experience to tell their story.
After all, the opinions of socalled experts are quite wide ranging, not unequivocal at all.
There is probably truth in both sides. I agree with AJ in that ADHD is probably overdiagnosed. I went through a situation with my stepson when he was little. ADHD was easier to diagnose with the comfort of easy medication than the proposition that there were other factors requiring a lot more effort and committment from the adults in his life-parents and teachers.
Medicating a child should always be seen as the very last resort when all other avenues are exhausted.
Children develop at very different rates and humans beings do not all learn the same way, through auditory delivery with some visual queues. Some of us learn mainly kinestetically. It is tragic to see children fidget away while a teacher is babbling away with perfectly meaningless noise when doing or seeing makes more sense.
What concerns me is this need to come up with a 'disorder'. We know so much and are learning more about how brains develop throughout life and the different ways humans learn, yet we are becoming increasingly less tolerant when all six year olds are not behaving and learning the same way.
There is no doubt that there are disorders, but aren't we becoming very quick at comparing and judging all children to a very narrow yardstick and then looking for a pharmaceutical quick fix?