You do not seem to get it.

What is however relevant is that I have rights under the current Constitution and anyone seeking to interfere with this better make sure to do it in a legal manner as permitted under the Constitution!
The moment you accept the mob rule to ignore what is constitutionally appropriate then forever will have the mob rule!

If however you desire to follow the legal path then accept that in regard of the Constitution there is no way within Section 128 to create a Constitution, amend the flag of the Union Jack or the national anthem.

Keep in mind that over a 5-year period the Crown litigated against me at huge cost and were defeated comprehensively by me. This, because I presented my submissions regarding constitutional matters backed up by records, including that we still have the Union Jack and t God save the Queen as our national identities.

If you are happy to pretend otherwise then that is your business but if you contemplate to rob me of my constitutional rights by way of mob rule to pretend to change the Constitution then you have another thing coming.

If you are willing to persist to ignore the rule of law as permissible by the Constitution then keep in mind that there are others willing to go along with you and they will ignore the rule of law and do whatever may suit them regardless then the harm to you, as you have squandered your constitutional rights.

Anyone who proposes to pursue a Republic must keep in mind that unless it is done in a proper legal manner it is a waste of time. Section 128 referendum is not the tool for it. My published books extensively have canvassed this and the post would not allow me to set this all out.

What benefits do you really seek to achieve with becoming a republic or a monarchy in any event? Is it some idiology without any reality as to the consequences?

Dear Mr Gerrit...,

Your argument is not with me, but with Australia.

And if you want to take Australia on, you're more
than welcome to do so in the future.