How unsurprising that runner's a member of the mob.

rehctub makes a good point - what will the mob do if Ferguson's found not guilty? I understand that the case against him is quite weak, in evidentiary terms - but the mob have apparently decided he's guilty regardless of the evidence.

You don't have to be a member of the "latte left" to understand due process and the rule of law.

Good old CJ, you can always be trusted to make a stupid comment.

To state that I demonstrated "quite succinctly the ignorant 'mob' mentality" just because I expressed my belief that Ferguson was not innocent was typical of your bluster with no substance - as usual. I'm sure that I'm as 'privy to facts about the case ' as you are, and have based my belief on what I know. Just because you believe otherwise doesn't make me wrong. But there you go with your petty little jibes of 'mob' mentality and the like.
But that's just to be expected from someone whose debating skills consist of throwing silly insults and distorting other posters' on-line names for a cheap laugh. Then again, to oppose your views earns a label such as 'fruitloop'. What a distinguished debator!

rehctub, I can only speak for myself in that, if he was proven innocent beyond a doubt, I would have nothing else to say on the matter. My initial statement still stands that, if he was innocent, he would need an ID change as many people would never accept such a verdict. I can't speak for those others.

Austin Powerless - you most definitely display the 'mob' mentality in pre-judging Ferguson prior to the presentation of evidence against him. Apparently you are also unaware that it is impossible to be "proven innocent beyond a doubt" in an Australian court, where the onus is always upon the prosecution to prove *guilt* beyond *reasonable* doubt in criminal cases.

Or maybe you are just incapable of understanding the difference?

Hey Austin

En garde man - this is a set-up. The mob distracts you whilst nearing ever closer. They're over at "Marriage and Child abuse" lynching some poor bas*%@d named "Polycarp!"

Their Kangaroo Court has condemned him to summary execution.

Your next boy - flee while you're in one piece!

Austin Powerless
Wrong definition of the word 'abuse'

Consider what was her purpose in prefacing her absurd remarks with "I am a policewoman..."? Clearly she was hoping to trade on the authority of her being a member of the constabulary. Her opinion had nothing to do with the police. All she did was lessen the image of the police.

Then she screamed 'what am I going to tell my children" (both are under Five.) Good Grief as I parent of 4, I would never discuss those issues with a child that age simply because of their lack of understanding all that would do would be to frighten them.

In reality she is/was either a hysterical individual or someone who’s part of a campaign. She lives 14ks and her cerefully worded bit a couple of nights later on TV makes me favour an activist plant. As a police woman she could have access to more information on him and other “undesirables”. I’m NOT saying she did anything illegal but she is open to that sort of criticism.

The major issue wasn't if he got a trial it was the that the mob (with the help of the media and an MP stirring them all up for their own cynical reasons) sought to trash our legal system.

Keep in mind Ferguson was guarded 24/7 he didn’t have free reign. Paedophilia isn’t vectored by mosquitos or the wind.

Runner, Time for your pills……. The devil made me do it :-)

dickie: << En garde man - this is a set-up. The mob distracts you whilst nearing ever closer. They're over at "Marriage and Child abuse" lynching some poor bas*%@d named "Polycarp!" >>

Speaking of frootloops...