I understand that the vast majority of judges do a good job and that they HAVE to make their judgements totally down to the letter of the law, sometimes they get some personal interpretation on the issues on their judgements. Many times, however, judges get that personal part wrong, as the beauty of 20/20 hindsight would suggest. The sort of judgements I'm referring to are against or for violent, sexually violent, sexually perverse or any combination of the above, or even for 'white collar' or other criminals that could pose an obviously ongoing issue against us as a society that judges have gone against advice from professionals or people 'in the know' with these individuals. Robert John Fardon being a PRIME example. Ongoing crimes over decades and he still gets released.

Would some sort of intervention by US, as citizens be possible against judgements that OBVIOUSLY are wrong. Like a vote of 'no confidence' in judgements where 'negligence' is obvious and public safety is obviously at risk. Something where WE can install a jury where the judiciary have to justify their judgements and where we can challenge theirs.

Probably a difficult one to implement Stg... but worth exploring for sure.

There may be other angles this problem can be approached from... not too many come to mind immediately though.
cheers mate

Where's the line between 'law' and 'common sense'?.

There is no line between the law and common sense in Queensland because we have neither.
If anybody can produce a document alleged to be an ORDER of the Supreme Court of Queensland that is SEALED with the SEAL of the Supreme Court of Queensland, as described in sec 190 of the Act, I will walk to Bourke and back.
Queensland Supreme Court Act 1995
Division 1—Seals of the court
Court shall have and use seals
Section 190. The Supreme Court shall have and use as occasion may require a seal having inscribed on a label thereon the words ‘The Seal of the Supreme Court of Queensland’ and such other seals as may be required for the business of the court and the offices thereof.

We are now going to officially get the Catholic Republic that Keven and his controllers want whether we like it or not so get accustomed to these so called judicial decisions being made in the administrative legal proceedings, dressed up as judicial proceedings in the pretend statutory courts.

Kevin Rudd's daughter did actually get the SEAL described above, embossed red label, placed on her CERTIFICATE to practice as a Solicitor, issued by the Supreme Court of Queensland and this is the only valid SEALED document that they ever issued from the Registry of the Supreme Court. All other documents alleged to have been issued from the Brisbane Registry of the Supreme Court of Queensland display on their face the BRISBANE OFFICE stamp and if you are prepared to accept that, keep voting for the criminal labor fascists that now run this country.
The-Federal-Court-of-Australia is much the same and it is now being dealt with and may well be before the High-Court within weeks, that is, if the High-Court SEAL is ever used on the originating process being lodged for the purpose of FILING and ISSUING or they just refuse to accept the documents at all as they do when its too difficult for the members of the judiciary to decide how to protect and conceal corrupt Govt decisions

I met Kevin 07's daughter on ANZAC day last year. Lovely girl.

What's that got to do with paedophiles (according to Gibo that's half of us), serial violent offenders, and others that seem incapable of being rehabilitated, released by judges against the advice of professionals...or common sense?.

This place has got more nuts in it than a jar of peanut butter.

"...criminal labor fascists...", and "We are now going to officially get the Catholic Republic that Keven [sic] and his controllers want..."

Lithium, son.