The Forum > General Discussion > Real Democracy?
Real Democracy?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
How can you have an elected position that doesn't involve politics? Isn't this just a way to circumvent democracy, by reducing what people can vote on?
"Where a small number of people controls a big number, there is potential for corruption.
You could easily argue the opposite. Curruption is easier to get away with with a more distrinbuted system (eg locval councils) because the media isn't paying as much attention.
"My suggestion is to re-localise government into thousands of (relatively) tiny councils that receive all taxes and rates.
This would not involve any kind of democratic reform. If the people wanted it, they could achieve it in a few years by voting for lean state and federal governments and higher taxing local governments.
"If I had my way, we would also elect judges and other key civil servants.
I think the Americans do this for some senior police positions. I'm not sure it is a good idea to introduce politics into that. I don't think they do it for judges. That could lead to a breakdown of common law. The reason we have to two systems is so that public opinion can override common law via parliament.
"I will never accept the idea that a 10 year old girl has a sufficiently developed sense of self to know if she is or is not giving consent for sex with one adult,
I think you misunderstood the judge's comments.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1197456786/1#1