The Forum > General Discussion > Science and the Murdock media
Science and the Murdock media
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I have never maintained anything other than that intelligence arises from a complex interaction between nature and nurture. Yes, I know that nutrition is a major factor in intelligence. In fact it now appears that the nutrition of your GRANDPARENTS may affect your intelligence because of epi-genetic effects.
(Google "ghost in your genes.")
None of this is in dispute.
But there is no well constructed study that shows ZERO effect of genome. The argument is entirely about the extent to which heritability accounts for the variability of intelligence with 40% being the bottom of the range.
There is no selection for dullness or dumbness. But some population groups may have come under increased selective pressure for smartness – for example because of the invention of agriculture or writing. Given the absence of gene flow that would cause a divergence in brain evolution.
In a sense Bugsy we are both speculating about the way the science will turn out. You have one view. I have another. In about a decade or less we'll know who was right.