The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Social media bans on under 16 year olds.

Social media bans on under 16 year olds.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All
I don't think 6 months indicates anything. Trying to politicise the whole exercise. The truth is these mega rich social media outlets profit from young people, and take no responsibility for the negative impact their organisations are having, everything from depression to suicide.

BTW if 60% are avoiding the ban, then 40% are complying, resulting in 40% less direct negative outcomes. that can't be bad, or are you fools more concerned about the income of people like Zuckerberg than young lives?
Posted by Paul1405, Sunday, 3 May 2026 7:01:55 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The under 16 media ban is not practical.
It reminds me of the abolition of alcohol.
That didn't work either.
But careful control of alcohol does, to some extent.
Perhaps better control of media for those vulnerable youngsters might be the way to go.
Could this be achieved; I wonder?
And are parents enforcing the law?
Apparently not.
So there is little chance the present ban will succeed.
But 40% might benefit.
Posted by Ipso Fatso, Sunday, 3 May 2026 6:49:44 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Latest on under 16 censorship: 85% of 13-15 year olds are getting around the ban one way or another. They are too smart to say how.

The media has had to go to America to get enough kids who self-harmed over social media.

It's not Big Techs fault. They have a product to sell. You don't have to buy.

Parents are the problem; in many cases it's a one-parent/no father problem.

While the loss of children is a tragedy, we are talking about a minority, as always, and normal kids in a normal family situation don't need governments interfering in what they do.
Posted by ttbn, Sunday, 10 May 2026 11:44:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Good to see there has been a marked reduction in cyber-bullying, because of the ban. There is also a strong indication that online predictor behaviour is being curtailed as well. Bullies and predictors will oppose and try to disrupt the ban, whilst they look for new ways to exploit children.
Posted by Paul1405, Monday, 11 May 2026 8:23:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
always was just a virtue signalling exercise. Same clowns can't define a woman, happy to have men in dresses sexualising kids in library, boys in girls sports and turn a totally blind eye to sexual abuse in Indigenous communities until extreme cases hit the news. These dei clowns only expertise is in virtue signalling.
Posted by runner, Monday, 11 May 2026 9:06:35 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
All good points, runner. These people are hypocrites and liars.
Posted by ttbn, Monday, 11 May 2026 11:21:02 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy