Canem, if you had to leave the Middle East then even back then Europe
would have been nbr 1 choice.
The Arabs are the real settlers, at the point of sword, in 7th century.

The history of the Mediterranean after 7th century is interesting.
After the Arabs conquered Nth Africa they operated the slave business
by capturing merchant ships selling the cargoes and selling the crews
into slavery. It got so bad that Rome stopped using ships for trade
and concentrated on overland routes where they had more control.
The Arab moslem Barberry Pirates were a real problem until the US Navy
turned up, landed Marines and told the Arabs of Tripoli to cease or else.
Hence the US Marines Hymie "From the Halls of Montezuma to Tripoli".
It just shows how long they run the roost so to speak.
In that period they even raided Britain, Ireland and even Iceland.
They attacked Iceland because blondes got a premium price on Arab
slave markets in the Middle East.
It has been calculated that over a million Europeans were sold into
Arab slave markets.
Hence people from South Eastern Europe are called Slavs to this day.

Criticism of Israel and Zionism legal under new hate speech laws says A-G Michelle Rowland
http://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/2026/01/29/criticism-of-israel-and-zionism-legal-under-new-hate-speech-laws-says-a-g-michelle-rowland/
Attorney-General Michelle Rowland has said in a letter that the new hate speech laws do not restrict criticism of foreign countries or political ideologies which would cover criticism of Israel and Zionism.

But then...

Criticism of Benjamin Netanyahu may be an offence under Australia’s new hate speech laws, Greens claim
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/jan/21/criticism-of-benjamin-netanyahu-made-be-an-offence-under-australias-new-hate-speech-laws-greens-warn-ntwnfb

"Shoebridge said legitimate criticism of Israel or the country’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, may be offences, if they cause psychological harm and prompt warnings to the government from intelligence agencies."

Then we have the IHRA working definition of anti-semitism.
This whole things a minefield.

You'd think AI could just provide me with a list of things I am allowed to say under the current laws rather than playing hopscotch in this stupid minefield, which is so deliberately vague as to frighten people to silence.

* All those except the frightened Christians that is, who are too frightened to say anything bad about the rape-cultured Israeli baby-killers fearing the wrath of god.

Genesis 12:3): The verse states, "I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.

Good Samaritans my arse...
They're on Team 'Ethnic Cleansing'

How on earth am I supposed to even know whether or not a comment might cause psychological harm?
If it does than they certainly haven't seen any footage from Gaza.

- Seeing that stuff CAUSED ME psychological harm -

How am I supposed to know if someone is a frightened snowflake or thick skinned enough to handle my opinions?

This puts the spotlight not on what I say but how some stranger I don't know takes my opinion.