The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Three separate studies conclude that GDP could take a hit if renewable energy transition is delayed

Three separate studies conclude that GDP could take a hit if renewable energy transition is delayed

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All
WTF?

Yes mhaze that should read 2050.

You were given sources, to say otherwise is just a sad desperate deflection.

The schooling I gave you was about how to navigate a web site I used as a source. You could not even use the search function to find the relative article. You appeared to stumble even with the concept of drop down menus. Go back through your posts and you will find it.

By all means dive down the conspiracy rabbit hole as much as you like and contort whatever bizarre meaning you wish over the inclusion of the word cumulative. It seems to pain you to accept my clarification.

I stand by the statement that I gave three sources at the start of this thread. Get back to me when you can show that I have not shown my sources when I began this thread.
Posted by WTF? - Not Again, Monday, 17 November 2025 7:17:19 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I have no idea what a grifter is. I know I would not prefer to follow an eighty year old technology That is still in transformation.
Australians know what is best for them. I do not take any interest in overseas projects, that has no comparison to Australia.
Solar is excellence in the making there is no comparison on earth to match such output unsupervised and free energy without any ongoing pollution.
All the whinging and whining will not solve anything just get on with it.
IT"s always the liberals that want to shortcut projects. Do they still exist or have they evaporated.
Posted by doog, Monday, 17 November 2025 7:42:44 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
free energy without any ongoing pollution.
doog,
?? What kind of drugs are you playing around with ?
Posted by Indyvidual, Monday, 17 November 2025 8:12:25 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"I have no idea what a grifter is."

Think about this doog.

You have 1gw of coal fired power. How much dispatchable power do you have if you add a)50gw of wind and solar generation, or b)1gw of nuclear generation? For a, the answer is 1gw. For b, the answer is 2gw.

A grifter is someone who tells you that all you need to do to replace your coal generation is to build more wind and solar. Unfortunately, wind and solar are not interchangeable with coal generation. Nuclear is.

South Africa is developing nuclear.

https://www.joburgetc.com/news/the-new-nuclear-race-south-africa-bets-big-on-africas-atomic-future/

Albo says Australians are too dumb for nuclear power, so we need Chinese wind mills and Chinese solar panels.

Grifters are the people ripping us off and sending the nation up Boggy Blop Creek without a paddle.

Time to ditch the grifters.
Posted by Fester, Monday, 17 November 2025 8:20:31 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A ‘recent study’ shows that Communist China produces Australia's YEARLY output of CO2 every 12 DAYS. Their GDP is predicted to rise by 27%.

Australia's predicted GDP rise in the same period is predicted to be 2.0%.

Just imagine what it would be if we used our own coal to do what China does with our coal now. Just imagine the jobs (unemployment is on the up again as mass immigration continues).

Whoever came up with the idea that quitting Net Zero and the other climate nonsense, renewables etc, will lower our GDP, is talking through his/her arsehole, and WTF is just repeating the rubbish through his own orifice.
Posted by ttbn, Tuesday, 18 November 2025 8:47:15 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Well, well, well WFT?

I tracked down your source (or was it sources?).

Was it this one.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uqB8PWyNuU

or perhaps this one.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wMzJAFLCfI

or perhaps this one.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHsdeBzjmcY

You see WFT when you just regurgitate others views and pretend they're your work, you almost always end up cocking things up. Which is how you end up with clangers such as not understanding that the Treasury figures were cumulative and that they referred to 2050 not 2025.

Not your finest hour WFT and that's saying something.

"The schooling I gave you was about how to navigate a web site I used as a source."

Well I'm sure you think that's true and actually happened. Meanwhile in the real world....
Posted by mhaze, Tuesday, 18 November 2025 4:57:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy