The Forum > General Discussion > Is it right to censor Senators in Australia?
Is it right to censor Senators in Australia?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
What is disrespect? It implies subservience to some higher authority eg 'The child was disrespectful to its mother." if you don't recognise that authority to begin with, how can you disrespect it. Then there is "disruptive", disruptive in what way? Upsetting the social order. This whole episode reeks of class authority and class distinction, which I don't hold with. providing Thorpe was not violent, although she could well argue that Charles represents a regime that was extremely violent towards her people, then there is nothing to worry about.
In fact if I met Lidia Thorpe I would congratulate her for the courage she shows in attempting to highlight very important issues, that are not being properly addressed by "polite" society.
BTW; Should not the Senate now censure the dissident 12 as they to have shown themselves to be "disrespectful and disruptive" by not supporting the motion! 58 voted where were the rest of the gang, dereliction of duty possibly, more censure required. This could lead to a very unsatisfactory state of affairs. Next thing you know uppity blacks will be wanting something totally undeserved from "polite" society.