Indy,

Would you care to repeat your previous statement on this forum, that 95% of Public Servants should be sacked! I have friends and relatives in the employ of the public service. These are hard working folk, some with families, kids at school, paying off a mortgage, paying high rents. Then you come on here and bad mouth them from your point of ignorance. You, who for years have had your snout in the public trough! Well you want a National Service, how about we start with YOU, one who is receiving benefit now.

Paul1405,
I heard on your GayBC Radio that there’s some upheaval in the Victorian PS about similar what I’m on about.
Of course there are are decent Public Servants & the bad things only happen when the good do nothing.

Indy,

Weasel words from you; "Of course there are are decent Public Servants & the bad things only happen when the good do nothing." It must be a small minority if you want 95% sacked. That's 95% of nurses, police officers, army personnel, teachers and the people who pick up your garbage!

You bang on about things like a National Service as a spiteful punishment for young people, but when I mention a Seniors National Service for the likes of Old Farts like YOU, you clam up. Surly even in your 80's you'ed be capable of sticking toothpicks in a bag in some sheltered workshop somewhere for 20 hrs a week! Yes/No?

Paul1405,
The Public Servants on your list don’t make up 95% of the Public Service who fail to perform. It’s the bureaucrats in the decision making circles whose policies the aforementioned are forced to work by & which cost the Nation dearly. You’re the one using weasel word excuses but the evidence is out there on a daily basis that 95% of bureaucrats are not only not needed, they’re actually & perpetually in the way of the running of the Nation. The ones you so vehemently defend & you very likely are part of.

Indy,

Don't try and weasel out of what you said in a broad statement, it was; "95% of public servants should be sacked".

Realising what an idiotic goose that makes you look, you now try to weasel out of it with words like "bureaucrats". You bang on about a National Service for young people, but when I suggest old farts on aged welfare should stump up with a seniors National Service, doing a bit of yakka to help earn your keep, for 30 or 40 years you've contributed nothing, you clam up. Would you, or wont you, be willing to be part of a Seniors National Service? If not, why not?

Paul1405,
I have already contributed & it’s your turn now so don’t try to weasel out of your responsibilities ! Liking stamps & playing Solitaire on Govt computers might see you through the day but to let others drag you along to every payday is nothing to be proud of.